The
Real Truth About Our
True Heavenly Parents
An
Introduction Into The Godhead
(Bear with us, we're all learning this new
subject matter.)
The man whom the
Lord called to build a web site for God’s Last Call Ministries over ten
years ago has asked me to write an introduction about the only two
“angels” who are named in the 66 books of the Bible.
Those two are Michael and Gabrielle.
For last two decades there has been an ever increasing interest in the
subject of angels. This interest seems to be generated by an
accelerated number of angelic appearances all over the
world. I heard a man talking about this in a church just last
weekend. These supernatural events are called epiphanies, such as
Gabrielle’s appearance to Zechariah and Mary, six months apart, to
announce the coming birth of John the Baptist and Jesus, the
Messiah. But not all of these visitations today are
friendly. Some of them are from the enemy of all souls,
pretending to be our friend.
This is especially true of the strange beings manning the so-called
“Flying Saucers.” And yet heads of state as well as religious
leaders are having secret meetings with these beings. As
early as 1858 a warning was given by a 19th century inspired writer
warning us of the true nature of this very phenomenon that is now
taking place. Listen: “Fearful sights of a supernatural
character will soon be revealed in the heavens, in token of the power
of miracle working demons. The spirits of devils will go forth to the
kings of the earth and to the whole world, to fasten them in deception,
and urge them on to unite with Satan in his last struggle against the
government of heaven. By these agencies, rulers and subjects
will be alike deceived. Persons will arise pretending to be
Christ Himself, and claiming the title and worship which belong to the
world’s Redeemer. They will perform wonderful miracles of healing and
will profess to have revelations from heaven contradicting the
testimony of the Scriptures.” GC 623.
The very next paragraph of this same book describes the false coming of
Jesus Christ calling it the “Crowning Act” of this great drama of
deception. Yes, Satan will “personate” Jesus in different
parts of the earth. Holographic images will also be used to
confirm this appearance as genuine. No doubt the apostles and
various saints from the past will appear in the clouds along with Mary,
the earthly mother of Jesus. Through this technology she will
be made to appear for the purpose of announcing the Second
Coming of her son and will confirm that he (Satan) truly is
the same Jesus she gave birth to over 2,000 years ago. The
prophecy states that the multitudes of earth will be deceived by this
over powering delusion. Only the Elect will escape the trap,
Luke 21:34-36.
Now, this is why we must learn the truth about our real parents because
Satan will claim to be the true and original creator of this planet who
has come back to save his children. Even the angelic realm
did not realize the evil nature and character of Satan until he exposed
himself by leading the Jewish rulers to crucify the Son of God.
“Not until the death of Christ was the character of Satan clearly
revealed to the angels or to the unfallen worlds. The
archapostate had so clothed himself with deception that even holy
beings had not understood his principles. They had not
clearly seen the nature of his rebellion.”
Just think about that for a moment. Ponder the deep
significance of what that really means in light of what Gabrielle told
Daniel the prophet in Dan 10:21 re: “none stands with me in our battle
against the forces of evil except Michael your prince.” When
the reality of what that really meant sunk into my brain it really
shocked and saddened me. I wept at the thought that Christ
and His Shekinah had been alone in their battle against the forces of
Satan since Adam and Eve had fallen into our dark dimension.
Ever since this same Shekinah began speaking to me personally
on March 18, 2007, I have been on a crusade to exonerate her
and Michael from all the lies and false charges that Satan has brought
against them from the very beginning. Do you realize to what
extent their names have been slandered? Once you realize even
half of the lies that have been spread all over this world about them,
it will stagger your mind.
For example, the Muslims claim that Gabriel helped Muhammad to begin
their religion and to write the Koran. And that is just the
tip of the iceberg, so to speak, of the false representations that have
been made against Gabrielle. She has been portrayed under
various names and titles since the beginning of time. The
counterfeits go back to Egypt with Osiris and Isis and the
Assyrian-Babylonian religions with Tammuz and Ishtar. All of these are
counterfeits of the real and genuine, Michael and Gabrielle.
I think that will be enough background information for now.
Let’s go now to the time of Christ.
We know that Jesus warned us in Matt 24, Mark 13 and Luke 21 that in
this last segment of time, just before His return (2nd Coming), there
would be great deceptions regarding the manner of His coming, His very
nature and character as well as the specific locations, such as the
desert. He warned His disciples not to go out into the desert
or the secret chambers. “If any man shall say unto you, Lo,
here is Christ, or there; believe it not. For there shall arise false
Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders;
inso much that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very
elect. Behold, I have told you before. Wherefore if
they shall say unto you, Behold, he is in the desert; go not forth:
behold, he is in the secret chambers; believe it not. For as
the lighting comes out of the, and shines even unto the west;
so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.” Matt
24:23-28.
I want to emphasize how important this warning really is by taking a
second look at vs 24 regarding the Elect. This is a very
special group of people whom the Lord will fill with His Spirit the
same as He did Moses, Elijah and even Jesus
Himself. And yet Christ states that the final test
which is going to come upon this final generation, the Church
of Laodicea, is going to be so deceitfully powerful that it
will almost “deceive the very Elect.”
Paul spoke of this also in His letter to the church at Thessalonica.
“Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power
and signs and lying wonders.” 2 Thess
2:9. In the previous verses, 6 to 8, Paul spoke
about the “son of perdition” being revealed by a “falling away” or a
“departure” that would cause the “man of sin” to be exposed.
A friend of mine did an in-depth study on these verses over the phone
with me and we came to some very interesting and shocking conclusions.
I would like to share the basic meaning that we derived from these
verses that we believe constitutes a most serious warning to each of
us. First of all, the “falling away” is not what we have
always thought it to be or what most organized Christian
religions have taught us to believe it is even though most
theologians have been very sincere in their teaching about this
verse. I was also very sincere in my efforts to
warn people that if they did not obey God He would destroy
them. That was what I had been taught all my life, so of
course, when I became an evangelist and pastor I taught the same
thing. But in 1976 the Lord revealed to me that was not the
truth. This came as the result of an intense study and
memorization of the first 20 chapters of the books of Psalms, to the
extent that I actually memorized each verse, repeating it over and over
until the true meaning was revealed to my mind and I could repeat it
without looking at it. Just try memorizing any chapter in the
Psalms, even the shortest one, which is Psalm 117, and you will find
out just how hard it really is. Then try doing the same with
Psalm 2, 7, 9 and 10 just for starters, which have 12, 17, 20 and 18
verses.
Remember this is 15th century, Elizabethan English. But the
Lord led me to memorize that version because the English language had
reached it peak of power and beauty at that particular time.
But getting back this predicted “falling away” and
“rebellion” that Paul is speaking about there in 2 Thess. 2.
What does it really mean? The key to understanding those
verses is to understand the temple Paul is referring to is not a
building or church but our individual temple which the church
corporately represents.
Jesus is our example. Look at how He rebelled against the false system
of religion in His day in order to free the people from the chains that
bound them, which included His own disciples who believed the
false doctrine that the Messiah would be a mighty super man who would
form an army and conquer the hated
Romans. His life and death eventually caused a
“falling away” from the Jewish church and temple worship to the extent
that those early disciples were persecuted for their faith in
Christ.
The true nature of the scribes, priests and Pharisees had to
be revealed before the falling away or rebellion could take place at
that time, as we know it finally did, when Peter boldly told the
rulers, “We ought to obey God rather than men.”
Read Acts 4 and 5 to see how boldly those early disciples spoke out and
rebelled against the authority of the spiritual rulers in their
day. That is what brought on the crisis which led to the city
wide persecution by Saul of Tarsus in Jerusalem. His intense
zeal scattered the believers all over Judea. This is going to
happen again because Rev 18:4 predicts that the voice of Holy Ghost
will call her people to “Come out of her, my
people.” But how can anyone hear that voice unless
they know the voice of the Bridegroom Jesus, who always speaks through
His Shekinah. That is why this study of the Godhead family is
so important. This is an introduction to what follows which
is an in-depth study of these two angels, Michael and Gabrielle, from
the first chapter of the book of Revelation, also known as
the Apocalypse.
As we begin, let's look at the last 13 words of v 1. "And He
sent and signified it by His angel unto His servant John." The relative
pronoun "He" is referring to Jesus. The first ten words of v 1 tells us
that "God" gave this Revelation or Unveiling to Jesus Christ.
By the noun "God" most people realize John is referring to the Father.
The original Hebrew word for God is "Elohim," which has three distinct
characteristics. 1. It is plural. 2. It is masculine. 3. It is
feminine. Actually, every language has these characteristics of
masculine, feminine and plural.
For example, in English we have he, she, him and her as well as the
neuter. So, we would expect the same would be true in the Hebrew
Language with God (Elohim) or in the Greek language with God (Theos).
"In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word
was God." John 1:1. Vs 1 identifies the "Word" or "Logos" as Jesus
Christ. "And the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us." We all know
John is referring to Jesus Christ, therefore, no further comment is
necessary. More will be said about the plural and feminine aspects of
God later on.
Another point that needs to be understood is the phrase "His Angel."
Who is this "angel" that John says Jesus sent to Him in order to
"signify" the visions of this Apocalyptic Revelation of the last days,
even the last seven years?
And what does the word "signify" mean to us today? Webster's dictionary
defines it as: "Signify: 1. to make known by signs, speech, or action.
2. to be a sign of; mean; portend (as in predicting the future). 3. to
be of importance or consequence."
The Greek word John used here in Rev 1:1, which has been translated
into English as "signified" is "semaino." Strong's 4591 does not give
any other definition but "signify."
Fortunately, he shows that the word "signified" is used one other time
in Acts 11:28. In that case "semaino" clearly means "to reveal, predict
or foretell," which is how most modern versions of the Bible translate
"semaino," in Rev 1:1, because that is what the book of Revelation is
all about... "Predictions of future events."
In other places in the NT the words "signified" "signify" or
"signifying" are from different Greek words meaning to "manifest," or
"to tell or declare thoroughly and reveal," as in Rev 15:4 when John
says "All thy judgments are made manifest." It is clear here that John
is telling us that all the nations are worshiping the Lord because all
His "decisions have been clearly revealed." The reason I went into so
much detail on this one word "signified" is because when we read the
Bible we tend to often skip over the deeper meanings the Lord has for
us.
Many times in the 1611 version, the words that were used at that time
have a different meaning today, as in this case. But I was impressed
that the reason the Holy Ghost inspired John to use or employ the Greek
word "semaino" is because that particular word means more than just an
"explanation" or "communication," per se. It indicates that this angel
was making predictions of future events which would take place in the
earth. And these events would 1. Happen in a short span of time (7
years). 2. Would affect every human being on planet earth. 3. Only
God's Elect people would survive through this 7 year period, especially
the last 3 ½ when the 7 last plagues are poured out. We will begin
studying this more in Rev 3 and again in Rev 11 and 12. I think you are
going to be very encouraged when you find out what a glorious
deliverance Jesus has planned for us.
Since 1976 the main theme of my ministry has been the "Love of God,"
which I believe is the final message to go to the world. Most people
have not experienced the wonderful Lord David is describing in the
Psalms I quoted at the beginning of this writing.
Hopefully, when you finish reading this Commentary on Revelation, you
will believe everything the Psalmist has declared about God to be true.
The prophet Amos wrote: "Surely the Lord God will do nothing, but He
reveals His secret unto His servants the prophets." Amos 3:7.
Notice the word secret is in the singular. What secret is it God wants
to reveal to us? In Strong's 6383 Paliy (paw_lee) is the Hebrew word
for "secret." It means "Wonderful or remarkable." "He who dwells in the
secret place of the Most High shall abide under the shadow of the
Almighty." Psalms 91:1.
What is the "secret" place of the Most High? In one simple word,
beloved , it is His heart.
Why do I say that? Because that is what the Word of God tells us.
Notice: "For who has stood in the counsel of the Lord, and has
perceived and heard His word? Behold a whirlwind of the Lord has gone
forth in fury____ A violent whirlwind! It will fall violently on the
head of the wicked. The anger (wrath) of the Lord will not turn back
until He has executed and performed the thoughts of His heart. In the
latter days you will understand it perfectly." Jere. 23:18_20. NKJV.
The RSV substitutes the noun "mind" for "heart," as do some other
translations. This is most unfortunate because we miss the true meaning
of what the Lord intended for us to understand about our Wonderful
Heavenly Father. And there are also other passages in which the Holy
Spirit is trying to reveal the very heart of God. But we have not
comprehended it.
That is why so many people, even Christians, do not think of God as
having feelings like we do, even though Gen 1 tells us that we are made
in His very image. Gen 6:6 tells us that God was "Grieved in His
heart," about the great evil and wickedness that was taking place in
the earth, which caused God's Spirit to be withdrawn.
The result was the Flood of Noah which destroyed all the then known
world. God's heart was terribly grieved over this catastrophe. But most
Christians believe that God sent or caused the flood to punish those
wicked Antediluvians, but that is not true. He allowed it but did not
cause it. I went into great detail in my book, "INTO THE FATHER'S
HEART," to explain the real cause of the flood.
In Phil 2:5 Paul counsels us to have the "mind" of Christ. The purpose
would be so we would learn to think like He thinks. But it includes
much more than that. Here again the original Greek will help us know
what Paul is trying to tell us.
The Greek word "mind" is translated from is "phroneo," which means "to
entertain or have a sentiment or opinion." It is from 5413, "Phrao,"
which means "the midrif" (as a partition of the body), i.e. (Gig. And
by impl. Of sympathy) the feelings (or sensitive nature). In Spanish
the word used for mind is "sentido," which has to do with our feelings
and emotions.
Actually, the Spanish is more correct than the English because they are
more in touch with their feelings and emotions than English speaking
people who seem to be more left brain motivated.
It is my hope and prayer that this commentary on Revelation will reveal
the true heart and mind of God. The last point I wish to make on Rev
1:1 is to go back to my question regarding the identity of the angel
Jesus sent to help John write out these apocalyptic predictions which
will guide us through the perilous last seven years of this age. Can we
identify this angel? "And He sent and signified it by his angel unto
His servant John." There are only two good or holy angels who are named
that God has used throughout the Great Controversy. They are Michael
and Gabriel. We believe that Jesus is Michael, which means, one who is
like God. Here is a study I did some time back which I will share here
now with you.
WHO IS MICHAEL THE ARCHANGEL?
Michael the Archangel has been a topic of interest for centuries,
perhaps inspiring a recent movie by that very title, "MICHAEL,"
starring famous actor, John Travolta.
In this Hollywood production Michael was a grungy looking, cigarette
smoking bum who shacked up with whoever crossed his path. Yet, somehow,
he had a good heart even though his feathers were falling out. There
was some "socially redeeming value" at the end of the film, which
Hollywood often uses to cover over and justify less than kosher scenes
be they sex or violence or some other unsavory example the public might
frown upon. At any rate, this is certainly not the Michael we think of
as pictured in the Bible where Michael and His angels fight against
Satan, the dragon, and prevail. Rev. 12:7. Only Jesus can prevail.
However, even the most devout believer in the Bible seems to have a
less than accurate picture of who Michael the Archangel really is.
Let's see if we can take Hollywood's distortion and even the church's
popular theological interpretations we have heard and set them aside
for a moment as we look into the Holy Bible itself for the answer as to
who Michael the Arch Angel really is. The name Michael is mentioned
only 15 times in the entire Bible. Only two times in the New Testament
and 13 times in the old. The name actually means, ONE WHO IS LIKE GOD
OR WHO IS WHAT GOD IS. This is a first indication that Michael is not
just any ordinary person or even an angel. He is one who is like God or
is in essence and reality what God is. Only the Creator could be in
charge of His angels.
Let's look first at Jude 9. Here we see that Michael is identified as
the first angel or arch angel which means He was the leader or head of
the angels. Gabriel is never called an arch angel. And in Jude 9 he has
the authority to tell Satan that the Creator is rebuking him for trying
to interfere with His plan to raise Moses from the grave...for the
issue they are disputing about is the body of Moses. One insightful
writer suggested that Satan was arguing that Michael could not raise
Moses from the grave because Moses had sinned by striking the rock
twice instead of just speaking to it. Now, who alone has the power to
raise the dead? Only Jesus Christ. He did it when He was on earth and
He will do it again when He comes as we read in I Thess. 4:15, 16. "For
the Lord Himself (Jesus) will descend from heaven with a shout and with
the voice of the archangel and the dead in Christ shall rise first."
Now, please notice that the title "Lord" and "voice of the archangel"
are talking about the same person. Let me prove to you that it is the
"voice" of Jesus Christ that raises the dead and no other. "Truly,
truly, I say to you, the hour is coming, and now is, when the dead will
hear the voice of the Son of God, and those who hear will live. For as
the Father has life in Himself, so he has granted the Son also to have
life in Himself, and has given him authority to execute judgment,
because He is the Son of man." John 5:25, 26. Finally, look at Daniel
12:1 where we find that Michael is the "great Prince who has charge of
your people." We know that Jesus is also called the Prince of Life. The
word Prince is translated from the Hebrew word, "Archegos" which
actually means "A chief leader, author, captain or prince." So, in Acts
3:15 when we read the words, "But you denied the Holy and Righteous
One, and asked for a murder to be granted to you, and killed the Prince
(author) of life." In Joshua 5:14 we find that the God of the Old
Testament appears to Joshua and identifies Himself as the Captain of
the Host of the Lord or "Commander of the army of the Lord." Look also
at Psalm 24:10 and you will find that "King of Glory," is the same as
the "LORD OF HOSTS," which, of course, is Jesus, who is also the same
exact being as Michael, the Arch Angel. The name Jesus also means
Saviour, Matt. 1:21, and the Michael who stands up to save His people
in Dan. 12:1 is also a Saviour. Only Jesus can save. May the Lord bless
you as you continue to study on this important subject. Pastor Mike
Clute
#6_ This level deals with the female image of God which is the focus of
this article and is what I have been researching and writing about for
the last two years. This has been the hardest level yet to fully
comprehend because it involves the Mystery that John speaks about in
Rev 10. In vs 6 the angels cried out with a loud voice, as when a lion
roars. John was told not to write anything about what the seven
thunders spoke. Then in vs 7 John was told that "In the days of the
voice of the seventh angel, when he is about to sound, then the mystery
of God is finished, as He preached to His servants the prophets." Rev
10:7.
-----
Read
this please:
THE MYTH OF SANTA CLAUS
AND MARY
-----
Is Gabriel A
Male or Female Being?
On pages 42 & 43 of "For the Love of Angels," you find
portraits of two famous angels from the book of Daniel, Michael
& Gabriel. The caption reads: "The only archangel commonly
portrayed as a woman is Gabriel." Why then does Dan 9:21 & 10:5
call Gabriel "the man Gabriel." First of all, "man" even in English is
defined by Webster's simply as "A human being" and in a general
application means "humanity" or "mankind." In Greek "Anthropos,"means
"a human being although most of the time it is translated "man." In
Hebrew the word man in Dan 9:21 is from "iysh" (eesh) Strong's 376
which refers you to 582 "enowah" which simply means "mortal," the same
as 1397. We need to realize that when the Jewish scribes copied these
texts they were influenced by the attitude and beliefs of their own
society. The Hebrew word for man is "Iysh" and the Hebrew word for
woman was "Iysha," only one letter difference. How easy it would be to
remove the "a" so it would appear as "Iysh" which would be acceptable
whereas a "female" arch angel would not be acceptable in a patriarchal
society and religion in which women had no rights but have been
repressed, castrated and enslaved from the Garden of Eden when Eve was
blamed for Adam's fall.
Furthermore, if humanity was created in the "image & likeness"
of God then when Daniel saw Michael & Gabrielle they would
appear to be like us, only in an unfallen state. And "God said, Let us
make man in our image, after our likeness...in the image of God created
he him; male and female created he them." Gen 1:26, 27. Let us now ask
this question which we cannot escape if we are going to be
intellectually honest in our pursuit of the truth. If Adam was created
in the image of Jesus Christ or Michael, a male, then in whose image
was Eve created? The obvious answer is in the image of a female because
Eve was a woman. This fits perfectly with the Hebrew word "Elohim,"
which has three elements. 1. Plural. 2. Male. 3. Female. This never
changes. So, what we have here is a very serious Gender issue which
Paul addressed in Rom 1:19_32. And is this not the same question we are
facing today in this last age with the "Same Sex Marriage" issue? This
is in our face every day of the week in the media. It is very obvious
that there are seen and unseen forces at work to destroy the very image
and likeness of God in the human race. In Rom 1:20 Paul tells us that
from "Creation of the world" the "invisible things of Him (God) are
"clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his
eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse."
Paul was not only a master theologian but he also was like a good
lawyer who goes into court with the facts to win his case. So we see
him here in Romans 1 defending not only God's "eternal power" but the
Godhead itself. We know that Satan has been trying to dethrone the
Creator Himself from the beginning so that he might "be like the Most
High..." to "exalt" his "throne above the stars of God: I will sit also
upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north." Isaiah
14:12_14.
As Paul continues on in Rom 1 we see him going to the heart of the
question re: the Godhead itself, i.e. the male/female issue. Paul is
not only referring to the sexual corruption and perversion in the Roman
society of his own day but has in mind what happened before the flood
when men took plural wives and women were degraded to the status of a
slave. And then after the flood we see further degradation in the
cities of Sodom & Gomorrah in a homosexual society. "Professing
themselves to be wise, they became fools, and changed the glory of the
uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to
birds, and four-footed beasts, and creeping things. Wherefore God also
gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts...who
changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshiped and served the
creature more than the Creator...For this cause God gave them up unto
vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into
that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, burned in
their lust one toward another; men with men...etc." Rom 1:19_28.
And so we see that the study of Daniel & Revelation is also a
study of God's original creation via Michael & Gabrielle, our
real Father & Mother, the true parents of this ravaged planet.
"And I heard a man's voice (Michael or Jesus) between the banks of
Ulai, which called, and said, Gabriel, make this man (Daniel) to
understand the vision." Dan 8:16. Why would Daniel need to make a
distinction between a male and a female voice by stating that he heard
a "man's voice? Why? Because Gabrielle, with her feminine voice was the
one who was talking to him most of the time. May the Lord bless each of
you as we enter upon a new year, 2007.
Shekinah" in Hebrew is a feminine noun, It is interesting
that Isaiah refers to the Shekinah using feminine pronouns. Especially
in Isaiah 51. Particularly in
Isaiah 51:9 and 10 and its context the pronouns are feminine. In verse
10 the KJV uses thou and it to refer to the Shekinah. Both pronouns are
feminine in Hebrew. The Qumran text makes the feminine form certain by
adding a yod to 2fs. Literally feminine "you she" translated in KJV
"thou it." Without doubt this is why the inter_testament Rabbis coined
the word Shekinah to describe the events where the physical presence
performed miracles to guide and protect Israel. In the same passage
(Isa 51:9) there is a phrase "arm of YHWH" that is used exclusively for
the Messiah. This means Jesus was the Shekinah presence in the Old
Testament events. That is why the coming of the Messiah and the return
of the Shekinah to the second temple are intermixed in the
extraordinarily mystically mixed passage of Zechariah 2:8_11. Subj: Feminine gender in Bible and colors Date: 3/4/2007 2:24:53 PM Pacific Standard Time
Web
Results 1 _ 10 of about 20,900 for proof that mercy was in the feminine
gender in Hebrew and rainbow was feminine. (0.18 seconds) Bibliography
on Women and Religion 13 [DIVINE FEMININE; GENDER & SEXUALITY;
PROTESTANTISM: RADICAL & SECTARIAN] ... in Scripture: A Dictionary
of Named and Unnamed Women in the Hebrew Bible, ... click here
www.nd.edu/~archives/LAU013.HTM
Ingrid
Daemmrich _ Paradise and Storytelling: Interconnecting ... The feminine
allure is doubled by its manifestation in both the pastoral ...
Concentrating on the s (sod in Hebrew), she interprets its mystery that
in ... click here
Paradise and Storytelling: Interconnecting Gender, Motif, and ... utes
from masculine to feminine. Unlike his literary predecessors, however,
the. change is also physical. Gender, sex, and paradise merge in the
narrative ... click here
l6) The author refers explicitly to the feminine Hebrew term to
describe the ... mercy is also a feminine attribute, and so Muslims are
reminded that God ... click here
"Tiqqun ha_Shekhinah": Redemption and the Overcoming of ... 27_46
(Hebrew section). A useful discussion of the problem of good and
evil in ... The amelioration of feminine judgment by masculine mercy is
actualized in ... click here
Genesis/Need
Help, please! _ BibleForums Christian Message Board ...Here are some
examples of words that have feminine gender: ... I really need you
now~I felt your mercy bringing truth to my soul, now I know Letting go,
click here
... ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: CHASING THE RAINBOW: GENDER
... extravagance to really celebrate the gifts of forgiveness and mercy
that God longs ... one of the things that have feminine gender; there
are many others, ... click here
Claiming Jesus as Savior in a Religiously Plural World: Given
the feminine gender of Wisdom and thus its deconstruction ... In one
Jew, a Galilean carpenter, the rainbow end becomes an intersection, a
cruciform ... click here
Shekhinah, Messiah: The
Hebrew word used to denominate God in Genesis is Elohim. This word is a
plural formed from the feminine singular ALH (Eloh) by adding IM to it.
... click here
The
final deception will come through a false teaching about who is earth's
true Mother. Mankind's True Mother is Wisdom or the Shekinah.
Proverbs 8. The False Mother of Mankind is Mary Through the
Catholic Church & apostate Protestantism and the exaltation
of Sun worship will reach its zenith in when Mary is projected in the
clouds of heaven.
In her
book, "The Gnostic Gospels," Elaine Pagels reveals that according to
very early records of the first century Christians, the serpent was not
the devil. "And the spirit_endowed Woman came to [Adam] and spoke with
him, saying, 'Arise, Adam.' And when he saw her, he said, 'It is you
who have given me life; you shall be called 'Mother of the living'--for
it she who is my mother. It is she who is the Physician, and the Woman,
and She who has Given Birth.'...Then the Female Spiritual Principle
came in the Snake, the Instructor, and it taught them saying, 'You
shall not die, for it was out of jealousy that the said this unto you.
Rather, your eyes shall open, and you shall become like gods,
recognizing evil and good.' And the arrogant Ruler cursed the
Woman...(and)....Snake." From "The Gospel of Thomas." 1_14_1.
In
my book, "Into the Father's Heart," I deal with Genesis 1-3 and the
Garden of Eden in much greater detail. When I first heard the idea that
there is a feminine image or character (person or being) in the Godhead
I did not accept the idea at all and thought the person who had been
writing about it had serious mental problems. But I did have confidence
in the lady who had shared the info with me. I had agreed with her in
all the info she had shared with me on the Harvest, which turned out to
be level #5. I did not have any levels back in the mid 90's. That just
came to me one day out of the blue while I was writing about UR. The
Lord just quietly explained that there were three levels and UR was
level #4. I figured that was the end of the levels. Then I learned
about the Harvest Cycle and realized this would be level #5. "Surely,"
I thought, "this is the end of it."
The coming of Jesus would
fulfill the Harvest of which there would be three, Barley, Wheat and
Grape to fulfill the Three Angels' messages. That made sense. But then
this female image of God was presented to me and I shook my head in
shock and astonishment. I had heard of this before and never accepted
it mainly because I thought the individual who was promoting the
concept was some kind of a nut case. It truly did turn me off. Then one
day I read the following statement which totally shocked me. "When the
fast westering sun should pass from sight in the heavens, Jerusalem's
day of grace would be ended. While the procession was halting on the
brow of Olivet, it was not yet too late for Jerusalem to repent. The
angel of mercy was then folding her wings to step down from the golden
throne to give place to justice and swift_coming judgment." Desire of
Ages 578.
I immediately called my friend and asked her:
"Is this what you were talking about? Is this the angel Gabrielle?" The
answer was "Yes, Mike. This is what I was referring to." So, I began to
pray about this topic very deeply. I had been sent a box of pamphlets
over a year before but had thrown them up on a high shelf in the garage
never expecting to read them. But now I knew that I had to begin
reading them. It didn't take me very long to realize how very wrong I
had been about the author of these booklets who died back in the 80's.
She was a college graduate and had done excellent in_depth research on
the topic. I was impressed. The Lord spoke to me about writing an
article on the topic so I sat down at the computer but my mind was
blank. I had no idea where to begin. The now familiar still small voice
spoke to me again..... "Kneel down and pray." And so I did and that is
when I received the title for the article and a text to begin with.
"The Myth of Santa Claus and Mary," was the title for an article that
immediately came to my mind as I got off of my knees and sat down
before the computer again. And Rom. 1:19_28 was the text. The thoughts
and words came so fast I could barely keep up with them. And that was
my first article on the female image of God which came out in Vol 27,
Number 4 issue: Oct, Nov, Dec. 2000. I wrote: "Recently the Lord has
led me into another investigation, a further revelation of His
character. Due to my own ignorance and prejudice I was not able to see
the relevance of what the Lord was trying to tell me or where it would
take me. So, I began to pray for understanding and the Lord answered my
prayers. In this article I am going to take you step by step so you can
see what I learned."
That was almost seven years ago. It has
been a long road but little by little I have listened to the Spirit and
learned. In the book of Proverbs the first seven chapters are the words
of instruction from a father to his son. Then, beginning in chapter 8
Mother Wisdom begins teaching her children. In Proverbs 8:22 to 36
Wisdom identifies herself as the female consort or wife of the Creator
of this earth. "The Lord possessed me at the beginning of His way,
Before His works of old. From everlasting I was established from the
beginning, from the earliest times of the earth. When there were no
depths I was brought forth...When He established the heavens I was
there...I was beside Him, as a master workman; And I was daily His
delight, Rejoicing always before Him, Rejoicing in the world, His
earth, and having my delight in the sons of men (or children, male
& female)." Proverbs 8:22_36. Notice that she describes herself as
a "master work man." NAS. It should be a master work person. Prov 3:19.
"The Lord by wisdom founded the earth; by understanding He established
the heavens." The point is Wisdom was a Co_Creator with the Son of God,
Jesus Christ. So, who is this female? Who is this woman who has been
hidden from us for over 6,000 years? That is the all important question
my friend. I truly believe this is the great Mystery that is about to
be solved. Let me say here that she is the Mother of Eve just as
Michael or Jesus is the Father of Adam. Just as Adam was created after
the image of the Son of God Eve was created after the daughter of God.
I Cor 1:24. Matt 11:19. Now, before I share with you what I have
already written about the relationship between Michael and Gabrielle
let me share with you a two texts I just realized fit right in here to
help us under_ stand more about our real Creators, i.e. our true Father
and Mother.
Paul wrote: "To those who are the called, both Jews
and Greeks, Christ (Michael) the power of God and the Wisdom
(Gabrielle) of God." I Cor 1:24. So, we see how they are still working
together as twins the same as in the book of Daniel, Dan 10:21. The
second text about Wisdom is Matt 11:19. "The Son of Man came eating and
drinking, and they say, Behold, a gluttonous man and a drunkard, a
friend of tax-gatherers and sinner! Yet wisdom is justified
(vindicated) by her children (deeds or works). NAS & Amplified.
Here is what the Commentary says: "Textual evidence is divided (cf. P.
146) between this and the reading "works." But the meaning is the
same--wisdom is to be judged by its results. Thus, patently, to
criticize John for one thing and Jesus for the opposite thing (vs 18,
19) showed complete lack of wisdom. Both had been guided by divine
wisdom, (Gabrielle or Holy Ghost) and this was evident in the results
of their labors. In response to John's labors, many repented (see Matt
21:31, 32; Mark 11:32; Luke 7:29), and in response to Jesus' ministry,
multitudes heard Him gladly (see Mark 12:37)." BC 5 386.
Beloved,
the incredible news is that Jesus is inviting everyone to come in and
join Him and His bride, Gabriel, who is the only daughter of the King
and Queen of the Universe. The King being God the Father (Yahweh) and
the Queen being El Shaddai, the Holy Spirit. Two other names for the
Son are Michael the Archangel and Jesus Christ. Two of the names for
the daughter are Wisdom (Proverbs 8) and Gabrielle. Daniel 10 describes
Gabrielle the same as John describes Jesus in Rev. 1. Almost an
identical description. Then in Dan. 10:21. "But I will tell you what is
inscribed in the book of truth: there is none who contends by my side
against these except Michael, your prince." The KJV states, "There is
none (no one) that holdeth with me in these things, but Michael your
prince." Now, just let that last thought sink in a little bit. What is
Gabriel telling Daniel? There is no one else who can stand by my side
or is able to "hold with me in these things" but Michael your prince.
What is Gabrielle saying? It is very obvious to me that she is telling
Daniel that Michael is equal to her and she is equal to Michael. I see
no mystery here in these very plain words. So, Michael and Gabrielle
fought and stood side by side all through the Great Controversy in the
Old Testament. And it was Gabrielle who announced the coming of the
Messiah to both Zechariah in the temple and Mary in her home as well as
the Shepherds the night of Jesus' birth. But when Jesus became a human
being they were split apart just like Adam and Eve were separated from
Michael and Gabrielle in the Garden of Eden. So, the Wedding Supper of
the Lamb is for the purpose of joining together that which has been
split apart by sin. But in order to do that sin must be eradicated from
the Bride so that she becomes pure and spotless and her robes are
without stain, spot or wrinkle.
Jesus or Michael and Gabrielle,
His twin sister and spouse are soon going to reap the wave sheaf or the
Barley, which is the beginning of the harvest (first phase of a
perfected humanity) and the promise that all will follow in order as
the Father has planned. You see Michael and Gabriel and Adam and Eve
were split up when Satan deceived Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eve.
Yes, they were separated when Adam and Eve fell into this dark
dimension of sin. That is why Jesus had to come into our dimension to
take on a body of flesh.
Now, this should really break our
hearts. He gave up this incredible love relationship with His beloved,
His sister-spouse to come on this rescue mission. Song of Solomon 5:1.
We cannot know how much pain that caused them for how much closer could
you be to another being than to be: 1. Sister_brother and 2. twins on
top of that and. 3. Then to be married as sister-spouse or husband and
wife. We do not understand this at all in our culture. But the deities
(gods and goddesses in the pagan religions copied or counterfeited this
with Tammuz and Ishtar in ancient Assyria and Babylon. Then you have
Osiris and Isis in Egypt who were twins...sister_spouse. The same is
found in Greece and Rome with Apollo and Diana or Venus his twin
sister_spouse. These are only shadow counterfeits of the real and
genuine.
Beloved, we need to do a lot more investigation into
how and why those counterfeits existed because where there is a
counterfeit there has to be a genuine or original because there can
never be a shadow of something without the existence of the reality.
That is how we prove the Mother image of God...because of the Queen of
Heaven...Jeremiah 7 and 44....they worshiped the Queen of heaven and
ate cakes to her like they do to Mary, the physical mother of Jesus. We
also have Tammuz and Semiramis, the ancient pagan goddess of the Moon
who was married to Nimrod, the Mighty hunter before or against the
Lord. Nimrod was the first anti_Christ who built the Tower of Babel.
Semiramis was a very beautiful woman...a priestess in the temple who
married Nimrod. He died and she taught that he went to heaven and
became the God of the Sun or Sun God and from then on they worshiped
the Sun as they believed they were thereby worshiping Nimrod. Semiramis
was an immoral woman like Jezebel who no doubt had many lovers and
relationships. She got pregnant and had Tammuz. And then they picture
Semiramis and Tammuz as having a sexual relationship in the pagan
religions. This was done on purpose to blaspheme and counterfeit the
relationship between Jesus and His mother and to distort the real
meaning of the true family of God and the relationship we are to have
with them. All this needs to be explained to the people so they will
understand who God is and what this Wedding Supper of the Lamb is all
about.. Ezekiel 1 and Rev. 4 and 5 reveal that the God head is not a
trinity of three males but is composed of four individuals. We know for
sure that the Father created all the worlds through His only Son, Jesus
and that are created in the exact image of the Creator, the Father.
.Heb. 1:1_3. John 1:1_3. If One man and One woman were created by God
the Father through Jesus then there had to be a female Goddess involved
as well in order for Eve to be created...In their exact image. Gen
1:26, 27. Rom 1:19_28.
We know that Jesus continually stated
that the Father is greater than Him, John 14:28 and that only the
Father knows the day and hour of His return. "It is not for you to know
the times or the seasons, which the Father has put in His own power."
Acts 1:7. My final thought here on this topic is simply this. Just as
Jesus learned obedience through what He suffered so can we. We have a
destiny which Jesus came to reveal to us. Will we accept Him at His
Word that He is able to transform us into His image and likeness that
we may be translated when He comes for His wave sheaf? That is the
opportunity that is being held out to all in Jesus' invitation to the
Wedding Supper of the Lamb. The Father waits for our willingness to be
filled with His Spirit which is the Spirit of God which includes all
four members of the God head. What a great privilege is ours today to
enter into this marvelous understanding and experience with our
precious Lord Jesus Christ who has suffered so much for us. May the
Lord bless and keep each of you as you pray and think on these great
themes of salvation. Your friend always in Him, Pastor Mike Clute.
In
no other sacred book is so much written about angels as in the Book of
Revelation. St. John saw a multitude around the throne of the Highest.
He describes them as clad in pure and white linen, having their breasts
girded with golden girdles (Rev. 15:6). Very striking is the
description of one of them: I saw, says John, another mighty angel came
down from heaven, clothed with a cloud: and a rainbow was upon his
head, and his face was as it were the sun, and his feet as pillars of
fire ……And he cried with a loud voice, as when a lion roareth (Rev. 10:
1, 3).
Clothed with a cloud! Remember what the Lord Jesus said
about His Second Coming: Then, said He, shall all the tribes of the
earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of
heaven with power and great glory (Matt. 24:30). Thus, the clouds of
heaven mean multitudes of angels. When Jesus ascended up to heaven on
Ascension Thursday "He was lifted up while they were looking on, and a
cloud received Him out of their sight." Acts 1:9.
Shekinah" in
Hebrew is a feminine noun, It is interesting that Isaiah refers to the
Shekinah using feminine pronouns. Especially in Isaiah 51. Particularly
in Isaiah 51:9and 10 and its context the pronouns are feminine.
In verse 10 the KJV uses thou and it to refer to the Shekinah. Both
pronouns are feminine in Hebrew. The Qumran text makes the feminine
form certain by adding a yod to 2fs. Literally feminine "you she"
translated in KJV "thou it," which is incorrect. Without doubt this is
why the inter_testament Rabbis coined the word Shekinah to describe the
events where the physical presence performed miracles to guide and
protect Israel. In my research he last few weeks I have discovered many
web sites and articles which document the fact that Old Testament
Jewish scribes deliberately made changes, additions and deletions in
regard to the gender of pronouns, as we have noticed above.
The
tradition of the Jewish scribes in copying the Old Testament was that
of extreme ... there is a chance for error or deliberate changes and
deletions. click here The
final deception will come through a false teaching about who is earth's
true Mother & Father. Through the Catholic Church & apostate
Protestantism and the exaltation of Sun worship will reach its zenith
in when Mary is projected in the clouds of heaven.
For proof
that Gabrielle is the bride of Yashua or Jesus (Michael) go to my God's
Last Call Web Site www.godslastcall.org and read the article, "The Myth
of Santa Claus & Mary." Read Dan 10:21 and Proverbs 8:22_36. If
Gabrielle & Michael are the original twins, husband & wife
& Gabrielle is equal to Michael, Jesus, the Son of the Almighty
Father, Yahweh & El Shaddai, Gen 17:1, then that means Gabrielle is
also deity, the daughter and princess of the Almighty as Strongs 1403
& 1404 prove Gabriyel and Gebereth is feminine of 1376 meaning
mistress, lady. In Luke 1:19 she says "I stand" not kneel in the
Presence of God. That is deity. She is the Princess of the Most High.
The colors in Dan 10:6 & in the rainbow of Rev 4:3 are feminine
colors, Beryl & Emerald.
Shekinah" in Hebrew is a a feminine
noun, It is interesting that Isaiah refers to the Shekinah using
feminine pronouns. Especially in Isaiah 51. Particularly in
Isaiah
51:9and 10 and its context the pronouns are feminine. In verse 10 the
KJV uses thou and it to refer to the Shekinah. Both pronouns are
feminine in Hebrew. The Qumran text makes the feminine form certain by
adding a yod to 2fs. Literally feminine "you she" translated in KJV
"thou it." Without doubt this is why the inter_testament Rabbis coined
the word Shekinah to describe the events where the physical presence
performed miracles to guide and protect Israel. In the index to the
writings of EGW or SOP under the word "Shekinah" there are 36
references listed. Although Shekinah is a Hebrew feminine noun EGW does
not mention this. But I will mention two important clues by which we
can know that "Shekinah" is the feminine face of God, i.e. Gabrielle.
Notice: "In the tabernacle and the temple His (Christ's) glory dwelt in
the holy Shekinah above the mercy seat." Prophets & Kings, pg 18. First,
the word "glory" refers to God's character and the "glory" of the man
is the woman. So, Father Yahweh's glory is El Shaddai, the Almighty
breasted One and their only begotten Son and only begotten daughter,
their children, the family in heaven. I Cor 11:7. "Forasmuch as he is
the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man." "In
the tabernacle and the temple His glory dwelt in the holy Shekinah
above the mercy seat." PK 18. "And from the holy of holies the visible
token of the divine Presence shone forth." PK 367. She was above the
Mercy Seat, 4BC 1139. "It was shadowed by the wings of the golden
cherubim, and the unspeakable glory of the Shekinah, the visible symbol
of the most high God, had rested over it in the holy of holies."
Patriarchs & Prophets, pg 584. In Desire of Ages pg 829 we read
about this same holy Shekinah who reluctantly departed from the first
temple and later, and then at the time of Jesus' trial and crucifixion
departed from her golden throne. "The angel of Mercy was then folding
her wings to step down from the golden throne to give place to justice
and swift_coming judgment. But Christ's great heart of love still
pleaded for Jerusalem....If Jerusalem would but repent, it was not yet
too late." DA 578. From these two references we may deduce, understand
by logical reasoning, that the holy Shekinah was inside the Most Holy
place of the first temple, i.e. Solomon's temple, but departed probably
just before Nebuchadnezzar came to destroy the temple in 586 BC. This
was their Mother Mercy who was their guardian Queen who was an angel,
even Gabrielle the arch angel of the book of Daniel who worked with
Michael, Dan 10:21. Whether a person chooses to believe this or not
does not change the truth of it one iota.
And so, as we have
already noted, Lucifer's rebellion began the very day the Father
announced that His Son was to be worshiped and obeyed the same as
Himself. "The exaltation of the Son of God as equal with the Father was
represented as an injustice to Lucifer, who it was claimed, was also
entitled to reverence and honor." PP 37. Isaiah 14 and Ezek 28 go into
much detail about Lucifer's pride and desire for self exaltation. This
is what caused him to seek to exalt himself above everyone and to
become God himself. And so it was that Lucifer and one third of the
heavenly host (angels) left heaven and eventually ended up on planet
earth. As soon as Adam and Eve fell a rescue operation was revealed
that had been put in place before the world was created. But instead of
being thankful for God's love and worshiping Him Adam and Eve's first
born son, Cain, killed his own brother. This first crime on planet and
all of the evil deeds (bad behavior) that followed only confirmed
Lucifer's original argument that the creation of planet earth was
flawed and was not a good idea to start with. And that is why even the
holy angels and the unfallen worlds wondered what God would do with
this world. "With intense interest the unfallen worlds had watched to
see Jehovah arise, and sweep away the inhabitants of the earth. And if
God should do this, Satan was ready to carry out his plan for securing
to himself the allegiance of heavenly beings. He had declared that the
principles of God's government make forgiveness impossible. Had the
world been destroyed, he would have claimed that his accusations were
proved true. He was ready to cast blame upon God, and to spread his
rebellion to the worlds above. But instead of destroying the world, God
sent His Son to save it. Though corruption and defiance might be seen
in every part of the alien province, a way for its recovery was
provided. At the very crisis, when Satan seemed about to triumph, the
Son of God came with the embassage of divine grace." DA 37.
And so, Satan had a "plan"
from the beginning which he had devised before he openly rebelled. And
in every generation he has been carrying out this plan. But through
Jesus, the only begotten Son of God the Father has devised a way of
escape. The four gospels, the writings of Paul and the other apostles
along with the book of Revelation reveal God's plan to help us escape
Satan's final trap so that we will be ready when Jesus comes to rescue
us. The circle was broken in the beginning by the fear of death which
Satan instilled in the angels who followed him out of heaven and down
to this earth. And it was the "Fear of Death" that broke the "Circle of
Life," for Adam and Eve. But through Jesus we can help Him reconnect
humanity back to the Father's throne. He is our ladder up to our
heavenly home and the throne of God. And when we all are finally
gathered around the throne of God here is what all of God's redeemed
and restored creation will be saying:
"Great and marvelous are
thy deeds, O Lord God, sovereign over all; just and true are thy ways,
thou kind of the ages. Who shall not revere thee, Lord, and do homage
to thy name? For thou alone art holy. All nations shall come and
worship in thy presence, for thy just dealings stand revealed." Rev.
15:4. In addition to that quotation let me add this one as well:
"God never leads His children otherwise than they would choose to be
led, if they could see the end from the beginning, and discern the
glory of the purpose which they are fulfilling as coworkers with Him.
Not Enoch, who was translated to heaven, not Elijah, who ascended in a
chariot of fire, was greater or more honored than John the Baptist, who
perished alone in the dungeon. 'Unto you it is given in the behalf of
Christ, not only to believe on Him, but also to suffer for His sake.'
Phil 1:29. And of all the gifts that Heaven can bestow upon men,
fellowship with Christ in His sufferings is the most weighty trust and
the highest honor." Desire of Ages, pgs, 224, 225. May
the Lord bless you and everyone as we each strive to learn more about
God's plan for our lives and for the humility to pray each day for the
understanding and faith to know and follow the Father's will. Thank you
for your prayers and support for the ongoing work of this ministry.
My personal journey in the 7 levels of God's True Character of Love
First
of all, the majority of white people within the USA do not care about
religion, per se. America is the most over exposed nation in the world
when it comes to religion. Especially white Americans...Caucasians.
This is the second hardest group of all to reach. The easiest group to
reach is the Spanish culture.
In passing out my newspapers and
pamphlets in Central America as well as here in the states 99% of
Spanish people will accept your literature if it is in Spanish. They
will accept English literature too if they read English. They are the
most polite people I have met. Second to them are African Americans.
95% or more of them will accept literature. Orientals are the hardest
group of all to reach. Very few will accept any kind of literature.
Now,
let us talk about understanding the message...i.e. comprehension. The
white or Caucasian race has the most ability to read and understand
because they are the most educated. But, trying to get them to read the
message is the first challenge and then helping them to understand the
message is the second big task. The third is for them to accept the
message, live it and share it with others. But that is the work of the
Holy Spirit. Actually, without the Spirit's move upon anyone's heart
nothing can be done for Jesus said, "Without Me you are nothing." Jesus
& His Spirit work together with the angels who are eager to use our
voices. "We are to be laborers together with the heavenly angels in
presenting Jesus to the world. With almost impatient eagerness the
angels wait for our co-operation; for man must be the channel to
communicate with man. And when we give ourselves to Christ in
wholehearted devotion, angels rejoice that they may speak through our
voices to reveal God's Love." Desire of Ages, pg. 297.
The good
news today is that more people are willing to accept the book and read
it then ever before. The first reason for this is because the Holy
Spirit is truly being poured out in fulfillment of Joel 2:28-30. So, if
you ever have had the prompting of the Spirit to win souls for Christ
this is the time to get involved. We must work while it is day because
the night is coming when no man can work. For those who desire to get
involved in the passing out of GLC Newspapers and the book, "Into the
Father's Heart," an understanding of the seven levels is very important.
Before
we begin our journey through these levels I need to give you a back
ground of how I was prepared to accept and begin writing about the
first level. Like most young people growing up in a religious home I
took the Bible very seriously. "The wrath of God" meant to me that the
Lord would destroy anyone who broke His law just like He destroyed the
wicked in Noah's day as well as Sodom and Gohmmora, Uzzah and many
others mentioned in the Bible. So, I grew up being afraid of God.
Elder
Paul C. Heubach, Dean of Theology at Walla Walla college, during my
years there as a theology major from 1956 to 1960 gave some relief in
his classes by quoting "Christ's Object Lessons," page 84, "God
Destroys No Man." He helped us all to understand that Satan is the
destroyer but God is the restorer. Having that theological background
gave me a certain amount of hope but I still didn't understand the
Flood and Sodom, etc. So, in the summer of 1976 I began memorizing
Psalm 2, having already committed to memory Psalm 1 in 1956 and Psalm
19 in 1958. It was very hard work repeating those verses over and over
again until I could say them without looking. But I kept on
persevering. Finally, I came to Psalm 5:10. "Destroy thou them O God;
Let them fall by their own counsels." It was a hot summer day late in
July of 1976. I was at my headquarters in Portland, OR, walking around
in the front room repeating these verses over and over when the Lord
began speaking to me in an audible voice in my mind. But I am getting
ahead of myself here. Before I share with you what the Lord said to me
we need to back up about 10 or 12 days to the final weekend of July 17,
1976. I was in the big tent at Gladstone Park, listening to my favorite
preacher, HMS Richards, talk about how one of his former teachers had
memorized the book of Revelation after he had retired. This retired
professor was up in his 70's but the Lord gave him the mental strength
and capacity to do it. This was very impressive. Here I was only 38, so
I surely I could do it. I began thinking about what part of the Bible I
should start memorizing. As we drove home that evening the Lord
impressed upon my mind the importance of understanding the Psalms
better. I already knew Psalm 1 by heart so decided to start working on
Psalm 2 the very next day. It turned
out to be one of the most difficult jobs I had ever undertaken. It just
didn't make any sense, especially the last part where it talked about
"kissing the son lest you perish in the way when His wrath is kindled
but a little." V. 12. I didn't like that picture of Christ. That wasn't
the God Jesus had revealed in the New Testament. I had to repeat each
verse over and over, sometimes 75 to 100 times before I could say it
from memory. I finally finished Psalm 2 and immediately moved on to
Psalm 3. It was hard work but I wasn't going to give up. Psalm 3 was a
lot nicer until I got to verses 7 and 8 which said, "Arise, O Lord;
save me, O my God: for thou has smitten all mine enemies upon the cheek
bone; thou has broken the teeth of the ungodly. Salvation belongs unto
the Lord: thy blessing is upon thy people. Selah."
Here the
Psalmist draws a word picture of Jesus that makes Him out to be a very
cruel and mean warrior in times of battle. Not only does Christ smash
in the cheek bones of His enemies He also knocks their teeth out. But
he is nice to those who serve Him. This really set me back and shook me
up for a little while. I knew that Jesus said in the Sermon on the
Mount, Matt 5-7, that we should love our enemies and turn the other
cheek and He told Peter to put His sword away. So, I prayed earnestly
to God for an answer but all I seemed to hear back was that I was to
keep on memorizing. So, I went on to Psalm 4 which gave me some relief
because it didn't have any verses about God hurting or destroying
anyone. Although it was still very hard work going over each verse so
many times until I could say it without looking I was finally beginning
to enjoy it because something was happening in my mind. I was feeling
closer to God. Somehow I was able to sense His very Presence in a new
and exciting way that I had never experienced before.
Psalm 5
was a real joy because it was emphasizing the close and intimate
relationship we can have with God when we meditate on Him and call on
His Name with the certitude and expectation of knowing He really does
hear us and answers our prayers. But He will not tolerate wickedness
and destroys those who will not repent. Here again I was being
confronted with that angry, wrathful God. Finally, I came to verse 10.
"Destroy thou them, O God; let them fall by their own counsels; cast
them out in the multitude of their transgressions; for they have
rebelled against thee." Psalm 5:10.
As I kept going over this
verse again and again it finally stuck in my mind. And then a wonderful
thing happened. Suddenly, a beautiful and heavenly light came on in my
mind and instantly I understood how God destroys. "Let them fall by
their own counsels." Immediately I thought of what Paul says in Rom. 1
about God giving up on people and letting them go. "Wherefore God also
gave them up to uncleanness...for this cause God gave them up unto vile
affections...God gave them over to a reprobate mind..." Rom. 1:24, 26
and 28.
As I continued to repeat this verse over and over my
mind began to grasp the meaning more clearly just as the pieces of a
giant puzzle fall into their respective places. I thought of how God
claimed that He had hardened proud Pharaoh's heart when Pharaoh
actually, had hardened his own heart. God didn't do it. He just took
the blame or assumed the responsibility because He is the Sovereign
Creator. Nothing happens without His consent or approval. These were
very awesome moments for me. Then it slowly began to dawn upon my
heretofore darkened mind..."God doesn't destroy." He simply takes the
blame for everything that He allows to happen. But He is not the
destroyer. Then I remembered what EGW says in COL, page 84. "God
destroys no man." "It is by faith that the soul beholds the glory of
Jesus. This glory is hidden, until, through the Holy Spirit, faith is
kindled in the soul." Desire of Ages, 392.
Suddenly my mind
flashed back to the year 1969 when Charles Dart, the then president of
the Texas Conf., asked Elder M. D. Lewis to speak at a worker's retreat
that summer evening. Elder Dart said that there had been a lot of
discussion going on about God's character among the ministers. Elder
Lewis had talked to many of the ministers about this subject and they
seemed to be split about 50/50 down the middle, as to whether God
destroys or not. Elder Dart said that he had decided to let Elder Lewis
present his case in front of all of the ministers. There were at least
50 ministers and conf. workers present. Elder Lewis stood up and went
to a chalk board that had been set up for the occasion. He was a
teacher, having been a professor or religion at the college at Keene
for a number of years. When the Lord revealed to him that God does not
destroy he began sharing it in his classes with his students. He told
me what had jolted him into a correct understanding of the character of
God was a statement by Ellen G. White. "There can be no more conclusive
evidence that we possess the spirit of Satan than the disposition to
hurt and destroy those who do not appreciate our work, or who act
contrary to our ideas." "Desire of Ages," 487.
Surprisingly
enough, one of the students who didn't agree with him and made quite a
fuss over the matter was Gary Rustad, Elder Rustad's oldest son. Gary
and I later became good friends although he never agreed with the
concept that God does not destroy as long as I knew him. When Gary told
his father about Elder Lewis' teaching Elder Rustad really made some
strong protests. Evidently a few others did too and finally Elder Lewis
was asked to resign. But they made a big mistake for they took him out
of the college and put him into pastoral work where he had direct
access to all of us ministers. Elder Lewis just happened to be one of
the most brilliant Bible scholars in the denomination, if not the best.
At least, he was the best I ever met. He knew the Hebrew and Greek
backward and forward, especially the Hebrew. And when he explained it
the Bible just came alive. I have a good video of him explaining the
sanctuary.
One minister who had been converted to Elder Lewis'
beliefs about God's character was describing to a few of us ministers
at a worker's meeting a few months before how powerfully persuasive
Elder Lewis' was. He told us that he had been present at a meeting
where Elder Lewis described the final death of the wicked. His
description was so graphic and his depiction of how the Father and
Son's hearts were breaking as they watched the wicked destroy
themselves that several of the ministers began weeping. So, when Elder
Lewis got up to speak that night I was all ears. I don't remember
everything he said but I do remember that as he was explaining how the
Law of God is a flaming fire that destroys the wicked who break it and
this fire is not literal but symbolic of God's love and also how it is
sin in a man's heart that eventually destroys him I was convinced that
he was right. So, all this began flashing through the memory banks of
my mind along with this new information. The lights were really coming
on and the darkness was fleeing away.
Then the Lord began to
speak to me directly in my mind. First of all He said, "Michael, if you
will stop telling your sob story and start telling My sob story things
will go a lot better for you." I was embarrassed and ashamed. It was
true. I was always telling everyone who would listen to all of the
troubles and problems I had been through since the ministry began in
1970. It felt good when someone felt sorry for me. This is what the
Lord was referring to when he said I should stop telling "my sob
story." I understood that part of it, but what I didn't understand was
"His sob story." So I asked the Lord, in my mind, "What is your sob
story Jesus?" Then, he said to me, "Michael, they nailed me to a
cross." And I said, "Oh, I know Lord. It was terrible. If I had only
been there I would have tried to help you." And then He said to me,
"But, Michael, that's not all they have done to me. They say I kill
people, and I have never hurt or killed anyone in the entire history of
the universe since I created it. When I heard and understood this I was
so shocked I could hardly think, let along speak. Finally, I began
trying to put it altogether, piece by piece. All of the Scriptures I
had read over and over again began to make sense. A very beautiful and
logical concept was beginning to form in my mind about my Creator God I
had worshiped and adored since childhood and now was trying to serve as
a minister. It was so exciting.
When Jesus was on earth He only
did good. "How God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost and
with power: who went about doing good, and healing all that were
oppressed of the devil; for God was with Him." Acts 10:38. Now,
according to most theologians in the past and even today, God is the
one who puts sickness and disease upon people. He also kills and
destroys. However, they also say that this same God sometimes heals
people. And the devil sometimes kills. So, in essence what the
preachers are saying is that God destroys just like the devil, only
when God does the killing it is justified and when Satan does the
killing it is not justified. The only problem with that line of
reasoning is that it makes Christ out to be a hypocrite. Why? Because
Jesus told the Jewish leaders, "Ye are of your father the devil, and
the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the
beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in
him. When He speaks a lie, he speaks of his own: for he is a liar, and
the father of it." John 8:44.
So, what right would Jesus have to
call Satan a liar if in fact Jesus Himself kills and destroys? Of
course, He would have no right at all. As the truth slowly began to
sink in I began to see the evil character of this terrible slander that
had been brought against the Name and Character of God through the
centuries. In fact, from the beginning of time. I was so angry and
upset I just began weeping as I walked around the room. The enormity of
this crime was just beyond belief. But what could I do? I was only one
person. Who would believe me if I began preaching that "God does not
kill?" Yet, I knew the record had to be set straight. I knew the Lord
had spoken to me in an audible voice in my mind again, as He had on
several occasions in the past. But I needed more proof before I could
begin trying to explain it to others.
In my research for my auto
biography I went back and read my diary and found that I had made a few
notes about this period of time. The last Sabbath of the camp meeting
was July 17th, 1976, at which time I heard Elder Richards and made my
decision to begin memorizing Scripture, which I later decided would be
in the Psalms. I began the very next day on Psalm 2. On Aug. 14th I
noted that I was starting on Psalm 6. So, evidently from July 18th
until a few days before I preached on "GOD'S WRATH" on Aug. 7th, I had
memorized up to Psalm 5:10 and had my breakthrough in the understanding
I just wrote about. The pastor of the Mc Minnville and Sheridan
churches, Dallas Dahl, asked me on the previous Tues. afternoon if I
would speak at Mc Minnville on Aug. 7th. I still have that original
sermon on cassette tape, #724, "The Wrath of God." So, sometime between
Tuesday, Aug. 3 and Friday Aug. 6th, I prepared the sermon which I put
in my second book, "The Wonderful Truth About Our Heavenly Father," on
page 363 and 364, as an exhibit in the appendix. As I said before, I
seldom ever prepared notes for a sermon but this was very new for me
and I didn't want to make any mistakes so I made copious notes for the
sermon.
The timing here is very interesting for the Lord
impressed Elder Dahl to ask me to preach just after I had received this
important understanding of the character of God. In fact, I began
receiving more and more invitations to preach on this subject right
after the Lord led me into an understanding of his character of love. I
preached at Grand Ronde, Hopewell, Newberg, Lincoln City and a number
of other churches in the area during this same period of time. But the
first time I spoke on the subject was Aug. 7th, 1976. I typed out the
introduction word for word because I didn't want to take the chance of
forgetting or leaving out an important thought or text. I was also very
nervous because I didn't know how this subject was going to be
received. But, no matter what the consequences might be, I was willing
to begin preaching the truth. I just wanted to make sure that the
message was delivered in the most factual, tactful, appropriate and
acceptable way as possible so God's Name would be glorified. The sermon
went very well and I was happy with the delivery and outcome. It is
interesting to hear myself today on those 17 year old cassette tapes. I
was 38 years old. The first thing I notice is my tone of voice. I was
very confident and sure of what the Lord had given me to say. But it
was basically all logic and not as much love and the sweet Spirit of
Jesus. But in my spirit I knew it was true and I have never changed the
principles of the message. So, that is how I came to understand basic
level #1.
Level # 2 is the "Animal Sacrifice System." In this
level I explain throughout my book that God allowed the animal
slaughter to begin with Adam but it was not His original idea. In
chapter 26 of my latest book, "INTO THE FATHER'S HEART" I go into great
detail to explain this level which I learned in 1979 and 1980 during my
3 ½ years in West Virginia. Page 389. That is also where I learned
about level #3 "THE TWO LORDS," which I explain fully in Chatper 27, "A
STUDY ON THE CONTRASTING PERSONALITIES OF THE TWO LORDS OF THE BIBLE.
WHO IS TRUE OR FALSE?" Page 442.
Level #4 is an expanded study
of Acts 3:21 which I called "UNIVERSAL RESTORATION OR RECONCILIATION."
This is the hardest one for many sincere Christians who cannot
comprehend how or why God would or should restore and reconcile all of
the Lost back to Himself in the ages to come. But the Bible is just as
clear on this point as it is on the first three levels. From pages 245
to 258 of my book, "INTO THE FATHER'S HEART," I share an in_depth study
on Revelation 21 & 22 in which I clearly explain how John was shown
how God will restore all of His creatures back to His eternal throne
after the 1,000 years. Rev 5:12; Rev 15:1_4; Psalm 22:26_29; 2 Peter
3:9; Phil 2:5_11; Eph 1:9_12; Eph 3:9_11; I Cor 3:10_15; Rev 21:25. The
gates of the city, New Jerusalem, never close.
After I had
understood and accepted this level I thought that was it. Surely there
will be no more levels beyond this one. But I was wrong. What this
revelation of His infinite grace does is open your heart and mind to
the final events John wrote about in Revelation 14, especially the
Harvest, which is Level #5, "THE HARVEST CYCLE or The Harvest
Principle. Jesus told the parable about the wheat & the tares in
Matt 13 and explained that the Harvest is the "End of the World." There
are three phases of the harvest. 1. Barley. 2. Wheat. 3. Grape. This
harvest will take place during the last 7 years of this age. The Barley
is another name for the Elect, Matt 24:24. There are at least 24 names
or designations for this group.
#6. This level deals with
the female image of God which is the focus of this article and is what
I have been researching and writing about for the last two years. This
has been the hardest level yet to fully comprehend because it involves
the Mystery that John speaks about in Rev 10. In vs 6 the angels cried
out with a loud voice, as when a lion roars. John was told not to write
anything about what the seven thunders spoke. Then in vs 7 John was
told that "In the days of the voice of the seventh angel, when he is
about to sound, then the mystery of God is finished, as He preached to
His servants the prophets." Rev 10:7.
#7. This last level
deals with the final transformation and translation of God's Elect at
the close of the first three and half years of this age. The Elect will
be translated at the time of the death decree which is explained in
Revelation 11, 12, 13 and 14 as well as Dan 11 and 12. Beloved, it is a
most sobering thought to me that before we can understand and
experience Transformation and Translation we must learn to know who our
real mother and father truly are. Because if we do not know them we
will be willing for them to possess us and take us home to the Father's
house.
With that in mind let me share with you some of my most recent findings on level #6.
Dear
Friends, I have selected a few paragraphs from just one web site which
is dealing with this gender issue of male and female. You can read all
of the original author's articles at www.jdhigdon.net. The following
paragraphs have been edited for brevity and clarity. The reader may
take issue with some of his concepts on his website but I found the
arguments I am sharing below regarding how the Scribes have changed the
gender of the female to male in the Old Testament extremely
enlightening.
The "Great Mystery" Revealed
God's Dual Gender And Plurality Of Eph. 5:31_32
As
contrary as it is to what we've been taught, it is clearly biblically
stated that there is a feminine gender in the Godhead. Let us begin at
the beginning, Genesis Chapter 1, and work up to the more urgent
present and near future. We are all conditioned to always envision and
refer to God in the masculine sense, specifically and exclusively in
the masculine gender. But we all need to learn and accept that God is
not one gender specific, but both gender inclusive, according to our
best source of divine revelation. Maybe important for some to note:
The
word Spirit in Gen. 1:2 "Spirit of God" is translated from a Hebrew
feminine noun. It is used variously over 350 times in the Old Testament.
I'm
no Hebrew scholar but do have some resources for doing word study. And
these are simple fundamentals, not some complicated grammatical
peculiarities. Those who want to conceal their original meaning
indicated by the context have obscured them to self_advantage.
Significant or not, that Hebrew feminine noun piqued my curiosity and
resulted in some other rather interesting discoveries. Some who fear
and resent any careful attention to detail might refer to it
disparagingly as obsessive_compulsive disorder; but I don't really
care, if God's Children realize (as God knows) that it is with profound
reverence and intended fidelity to God's Word that I seek truth for His
advantage, not try to twist it to mine.
Gen. 1:26-27 is so
simple and clearly stated that even a child, not brainwashed into
unquestioned acceptance of the status quo, could easily understand. Mt.
11:25 "I thank thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because thou
hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them
unto babes." Note: Gen. 1:26_27 says, "And God (Elohim, a Hebrew
plural) said, Let us make man (Adam - humankind) in our image, after
our likeness." Note the plurals. God not only said "in our image" but
also "after our likeness." Indicating that we are created not only in
the visual image, but also patterned spiritually after the Deity. Image
would mean to look like, while likeness would mean to be like. Consider
it? Let us carefully read verse 27, "So God created man (mankind) in
his own image, in the image of God created he him (singular group);
male and female created he them." Note that "image of God" and "male
and female" are synonymous here (Male + Female = Biblically accurate
visual representation of God)
Those who are sincere but
misguided are urged to consider the liberating truth and yield to it.
Female existence alone confirms the Divine Feminine whom she's
patterned after. (In other words the Mother God of Israel, El Shaddai,
the Almighty Breasted One).
Now, if there yet remains an iota of
doubt, stand in front of a mirror, a male and a female. What you will
see (according to God's own words) is a clear physical representation
(i.e., image) of the invisible God. How can anyone deny that being what
is clearly stated, and why would anyone want to? Now let's continue
logically. If God patterned us (male and female) after Himself and the
one to whom He said "let us make man in our image, after our likeness,"
then our duality leaves no doubt as to God's, does it? it strongly
suggests that He was addressing Feminine Deity.
Note carefully!
In Eph. 5:31-32 the Spirit through Paul says, "For this cause shall a
man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife
(woman), and they two shall be one flesh. This is a great mystery (note
"great mystery"): but I speak concerning Christ and the church
(ecclesia)." In other words, the word says, Christ shall leave His
Father (God) and Mother (Goddess) and shall be joined to His woman
(spiritual bride) the ecclesia (called out ones or true church). So
what was a mystery is now clear, right? God's Word makes it clear when
the right parts are connected. And, of course, Christ and his bride
(the true church - the obedient ones) shall be the one body of Christ
(with many parts), with Christ/Messiah as their leader.
Important
to note is that the Hebrew (ishshah), in Gen. 2:24, translated "wife,"
as the Greek (gune) in Eph. 5:31, means simply "woman," not necessarily
wife, as we define wife. The English translators (as some of the
ancient Hebrews) have had a field day distorting the true meaning of
God's Holy Scripture, with deliberate inaccurate, misleading, and
deceptive translations in which they deliberately altered the true
gender of the noun from feminine to masculine.
Very important
here also, is the noun Elohim (plural) translated "God" over 2340 times
in the Old Testament. Why did the translators render it singular? What
do you think? When God first inspired the prophet to write that word,
He chose the plural 2340 times; but the translators chose to change it
to singular. Were they presuming to correct God's grammar by rendering
it in the singular, or were they trying to hide something? And if so,
what were they trying to hide? Some sources say that Elohim is the
plural form of "El," a masculine singular used around 245 times, or
"eloahh," this singular with a feminine ending used around 56 times, so
God did have choices. Note: There is a very important reason Satan did
not want the feminine gender to come out in the translations and why he
has suppressed women ever since the Garden of Eden. See pages 159,
391_400 of the book "Into the Father's Heart."
The Hebrew name
for God was written some sixty-five hundred (6500) times in the Old
Testament. It is a four-letter word sometimes referred to as the
Tetragrammaton, transliterated into English as YHWH. Keep in mind that
Hebrew was originally written without vowels. The Masoretic text has
symbols to represent vowel sounds, but they were added by the Masoretes
in around 800 AD, claiming it was to preserve the original
pronunciation of Hebrew words. In normal writing the true definition
and thus the correct vowel sound was determined by the context; for
example, the English word dog written with only consonants, as Hebrew
is, even today, would be dg. You would not know, except for the
context, if it was dog, dig, dug, etc. Some Hebrew words, like English,
have many distinct meanings depending on the context, made even more
difficult by the lack of vowels.
A biased or mistaken translator
might be inclined to change a few vowel sounds just a little here and
there, right? By the simple change of a vowel sound, they could alter
the meaning of many words anywhere from just a little to radically. By
the time the Masoretes got around to adding the symbols, developed by
Jewish scholars to represent the vowel sounds, they claimed that the
true pronunciation of YHWH had already been lost. What a shame!
Something as important as the proper pronunciation of God's Holy name
that He inspired around 6500 times, lost!
They claimed that
YHWH, the name of God, was too sacred to be uttered and relegated it to
the footnotes, substituting the Hebrew masculine Adonai, which means
Lord, and is no longer a name but a title. In the KJV (don't know how
many others), that title is always written with all uppercase letters
"the LORD." Every time you see that all_uppercase title, some 6500
times, remember that it is a scribal substitute for the divine name
YHWH. Several other versions have restored YHWH and tried I suppose to
render it with the proper vowel sounds. Some render it Yahweh and
others, such as the American Standard Version, as Jehovah.
Again,
I stress, the scribes changed it some 6500 times! Why would the Hebrew
writers not leave God's name exactly as He originally inspired it
(6500) times, if they truly revered His Word? What arrogance! How could
they consider it too sacred to be uttered but not too sacred to be
changed and the original meaning hidden until even the proper
pronunciation of God's important name was lost? What could have been
their true motive? Guess what! The final "ah" in Hebrew, as in God's
name, Jehovah, usually denotes a feminine ending. It should also be
noted that the variant Yahweh likewise avoids the feminine ending, and
rather conveniently one might add.
Remember, the Hebrew word
Adam means "a human being" (or mankind); the Hebrew word ish means "a
man as an individual or a male person" (Strong's Hebrew and Chaldee
Lexicon). But get this, the Hebrew word ishshah (note the feminine
"ah") means "woman." Could that feminine ending "ah" in YHWH (rendered
Jehovah) be what caused the ancient Hebrew scribes such unbearable pain
that they had to relegate God's Holy name to the footnotes?
Could
it be that they just didn't want to be asked to explain the feminine
ending in the name of the God they wanted the world to think that God
viewed women with contempt? Jesus addressed this issue in Luke 11:52
regarding the Scribes changing, distorting and perverting God's Word.
"Woe to you lawyers! For you have taken away the key of knowledge
(God's character); you did not enter in yourselves, and those who were
entering in you hindered." In John 17:3 Christ, in His great prayer
gives us the "key" to Eternal Life. "And this is eternal life, that
they may know You the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom You have
sent." NAS.
No true Child of God (then or now) would
deliberately change God's words for any reason; and any who know that
they have been changed, as well do the scholars and many world renown
pastors and evangelists, yet prefer to not make waves, are likewise not
true Children of God. What a shameful, careless, and self_serving
handling of God's Holy name!
They have obscured God's duality,
gender, and proper name, but that's not all. What else have they tried
to write out of the Holy Writ? We will explore that in a later chapter.
For now let us try to understand why the translators have repeatedly
changed a word meaning children to "sons" throughout all Scripture.
The Children of God
The
Hebrew word "ben" is translated "son" around 2250 times in the Old
Testament. In many cases offspring would be more accurate. It is not
gender specific. Of course, often, the gender of the subject is made
clear by the context. Where there is no clear indication, as in the
many times it is translated "Sons of God," why wouldn't anyone not
gender biased translate it "Children of God" instead?
The Greek
word "huios" translated "son" around 380 times in the New Testament can
mean "child, foal (the young offspring of a donkey, mule, horse), or
son." Also, of course, daughter. It can mean remote descendants or
offspring; hence, posterity or children. Almost every time the phrase
"Sons of God" is used in Scripture, it should be translated "Children
of God." Not only is it most often not gender specific, it is almost
always both gender inclusive.
Inerrant and Infallible
Most
all Christian scholars and teachers claim to believe that the Bible is
inerrant and infallible. Some admit that the Bible is not inerrant and
infallible, being a product of man's translation and interpretation,
but claim to believe that the original manuscripts were. How can they
both believe that the divinely inspired Scriptures are inerrant and
infallible and yet that God inappropriately or accidentally used the
Hebrew plural Elohim for God around 2340 times in the Old Testament
when the singular was intended? How dare those who claim the Bible is
inerrant and infallible in its humanly corrupted form conclude that in
the original divinely inspired form God was mistaken and needed them to
correct His mistakes (over 2300 times, this single word alone)?
It
is shocking to me! Shocking that we could have allowed ourselves to be
so duped by them for so very long! How could they possibly claim to
believe that God is All_knowing and Almighty but that He doesn't
understand the grammatical difference between singular and plural,
masculine and feminine, and that it was wrong of Him to include the
divine name in Scripture some 6500 times?
In Mt. 5:18 Jesus
said, "For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot
or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be
fulfilled." The word "jot" here is of Hebrew origin and refers to the
Hebrew letter Yod, which closely resembles the English apostrophe ('),
the smallest Hebrew letter. Tittle refers to the finest or smallest
point - the teeniest little thing. Jesus was saying that not even the
smallest thing in God's inspired words should in any way be changed,
that God said exactly what He intended to say. Also, the Spirit through
Jesus was referring to God's laws, all of which are subsumed under the
one command that we love one another; not what man has added, much in
the form of the 613 Judaic commandments and endless church doctrines,
some of which limit even what a member is allowed to think.
God's
commands are simple; man's very burdensome and impossible to fulfill.
The Spirit gave strong warning in Rev. 22:18-19, "For I testify unto
every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any
man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues
that are written in this book: And if any man shall take away from the
words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of
the book of life, and out of the holy city, and [from] the things which
are written in this book." When I referred to that passage in 1983, a
relative wondered if that only applied to the Book of Revelation.
Considered with Mt. 5:18, I would hate to take that gamble with
eternity, wouldn't you? In Mt. 4:4 Jesus told Satan that "Man shall not
live by bread (earthly food) alone, but by every word that proceedeth
out of the mouth of God." Jesus reference was to God's words, not those
of the scribes who detracted from and added to them; or of those who
now perpetuate the false scribes' deceptions, for whom money is the
bottom line.
As an end note, let me say that one important
reason for the obscurity in Revelation, Daniel, other end-time
prophecy, and just things in general, as we've discussed here, could be
because God knew with certainty that if certain scribes understood
them, that they would change them to support their particular agenda or
remove them altogether. If they didn't understand them, they wouldn't
know how to manipulate them. He pronounced woe on the scribes too many
times to list here (Mt. 23:13-29). It should take but a little rational
thinking to figure out why He was so incensed with them and what they
did that elicited His repeated strong invectives against them. A
scribe's job, among other things, was to copy, write, record, and in
some cases interpret Mosaic and Judaic law. Google Groups results for How Hebrew Scribes deliberately changed female gender to male in OT
KJVBible
The
tradition of the Jewish scribes in copying the Old Testament was that
of extreme ... there is a chance for error or deliberate changes and
deletions. ... kingshouse.org/KJVBible.htm
JSTOR: Gender: Matched Synonymous Parallelism in the OT
The
standard works on noun gender in Hebrew are K. Albrecht, ... 85
"Traditionally, male and female servants were paired with masters of
the same sex,": P. ... click here
SUSAN JUSTER | Demagogues or Mystagogues? Gender and the Language ...
The
answer depended largely on the gender of the prophet. Male and female
prophets assumed different audiences for their texts, positioned
themselves ... click here
On Faith: Guest Voices: Bible Crystal Clear on Male_Female Equality
You
didn't mention the best example of male _female equality in early ...
Is the "equality" of women an outgrow of and response to secular
changes made to ... click here
Man as Male and Female: Created in the Image of God
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat be
used to refer to human beings in general, both male and female. When.
translators deliberately change the text to make it "gender_neutral"
instead ... click here
Barbara Newman _ Henry Suso and the Medieval Devotion to Christ ...
21
Hence in this part of his dialogue, Suso quietly changes the gender of
Eternal ... For male and female images of Eternal Wisdom in the
Exemplar see ... click here
Literary Terms and Definitions
Thereafter,
scribes wrote them down. The Icelandic sagas take place when Iceland
... of the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament) produced in the third century
BCE... click here
Rev. Archimandrite Nektarios Serfes _ Greek Orthodox Spirituality
Icon of Archangels Michael and Gabriel
The Holy Angels An Orthodox Perspective Angels: Our Elder Brethren Written by St. Nicholai Velimirovic, Bishop of Zica Compiled by Archimandrite Nektarios Serfes Boise, Idaho, USA August 13th 2004
"Whom Christ loves, His angels love too." St. Nicholai of Zica (1880_+1956)
Our Holy Bible starts with this sentence: In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
By
Heaven is meant not an empty space beyond our space, but the living
world of invisible spirits. Thus, the above sentence could be phrased
in other words: In the beginning God created the invisible and the
visible world, as it is said in the first article of our Creed. The
Psalmist says: By the Word of the Lord were the heavens established,
and all the might of them by the Spirit of His mouth (Ps. 32:6).
In
this case, according to the interpretation of the Fathers of the
Church, the Father is called the Lord; the Son, the Word of the Father;
and the Holy Spirit, the Breath of the Father.
The Prophet
Isaiah saw seraphim's (6:2) and Ezekiel the cherubim's (10:8) with some
other strange creatures around the throne of the Highest. Micaiah said
to the King Ahab: I saw the Lord sitting on His throne and all the host
of heaven standing by Him on His right hand and on His left (I Kings
22:19).
Nehemiah said in his prayer: Thou, even Thou, art Lord
alone; Thou has made heaven, the heaven of heavens, with all their host
(Neh. 9:6).
The great Daniel saw God on His throne_and a
thousand thousands ministered unto Him, and ten thousand times ten
thousand stood before Him (Chapters 9 and 10).
St. Paul speaking
of the power of Christ says: Who is this image of the invisible God,
the firstborn of every creature: For by Him were all things created,
that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible,
whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers:
all things were created by Him, and for Him. And He (Christ) is before
all things, and by Him all things consist (Col. 1:15_17; cf. I Pet.
3:22).
Summing up all the names of the angelic hosts, St.
Dionysius the Areopagite classifies them by their ranks_three times
three equals nine: "thrones, dominions, principalities, seraphim's,
cherubim's, powers, sovereignties, archangels, and angels." All of
them, however, we popularly call angels, or angelic hosts.
We
read in the Book of Job, how the Lord gave answer to the complaints of
that suffering man, saying: Where wast thou_when the morning stars
(i.e. first created angels) sang together, and all the sons of God
shouted for joy? (Job 38: 1_17).
And our sacred poet says:
Stars of the morning, so gloriously bright Filled with celestial splendor and light These that__where night never follows day_ Raise the 'Thrice Holy' song ever and age…… Then when the earth was first poised in mid space, Then, when the planets first sped on their race, Then, when were ended the six days employ, Then, all the sons of God shouted for joy.
(Joseph the Hymnographer_Translation in the English Hymnal).
Our
Orthodox Church has dedicated Monday to the holy angels. Therefore,
every Monday in the church services we are reminded of the holy angels
with praise and prayer: "Holy Archangels and Angels, pray to God for
us."
The angelic hosts were created before men. That is the first reason we call them our elder brethren.
The Nature of Angels
The
nature of angels is in some ways quite different from the nature of
man, and in other ways similar to it. On the one hand, the differences
are these: The angels are bodiless and, as such, invisible to our
physical eyes. Having no body, they consequently have no bodily needs
or desires and passions, no cares about food, drink, clothes or
shelter. Nor do they possess the impulse and cravings for procreation.
They neither marry nor are given in marriage (Matt. 22:30). They have
no worries about the future either, and no fear of death. For, though
God created them before man, they are neither aged nor aging, but
unchangingly youthful, beautiful and strong. They have no anxiety about
their salvation and no struggle for immorality, being already immortal.
Unlike men, they are not faltering between good and evil, being already
good and holy as when God created them.
On the other hand, the
angels are similar to men in that they are personalities, everyone
being individually conscious of himself. Like men, they have
intelligence, emotions, free will and acting capacity. And withal they
bear personal names like men. Some of their names we know either from
Scripture or Church Tradition. They are: Michael, Gabriel, Raphael,
Uriel, Salathiel, Barachiel, Jeremiel, Jegudiel.
Comparing men
with angels, St. Paul quoted they words of an ancient prophet who spoke
of God: O Lord _ what is man, that Thou art mindful of him? Or the son
of man, that Thou visitest him? Thou madest him a little lower than the
Angels; Thou crownest him with glory and honor, and didst set him over
the works of Thy hands; Thou has put all things in subjection under his
feet (Heb. 2:6_8; Ps. 8:4_6).
Indeed, God gave a tremendous
dominion over His works to the first sinless Adam, before this man
despised God's commandment and joined Satan, God's adversary. Before
the sin, man was equal to God's angels in power, purity and beauty. But
through sin man's dominance over God's works dwindled to almost
nothing. Nature became disobedient to him who was disobedient to God.
Disobedient to its former lord, nature yet livers in expectation. The
Apostle speaks of that as follows: For the earnest expectation of the
creature waiteth for the manifestation of the sons of God, in order to
be again obedient and happy, as in Eden. Until then the whole creation
groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now, being itself in the
bondage of corruption, like its fallen lord (Rom. 8:19,22).
Yet,
regenerated through Christ, man will again be angel_like, clothed with
Christ's glory. Meanwhile, his elder brethren, the holy and unsoiled
angels, are ministering to him, as physicians to the sick, toward his
health and salvation. As it is written of them: Are they not all
ministering spirits, sent forth to minister for them who shall be heirs
of salvation? (Heb. 14:14). Of this, however, more shall be spoken
later.
The Appearances of Angels
The appearances of angels are different purposely as to different persons and occasions.
The
appearance of an angel to Moses was as follows: When Moses was a
shepherd in the desert, the angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a
flame of fire out of the midst of a bush; and he looked, and, behold,
the bush burned with fire, and the bush was not consumed. And God
called unto him out of the midst of the bush, and said, "Moses, Moses"
(Ex. 3:2,4). Moses saw no face and no figure but the fire, and out of
the fire he heard the voice calling him and instructing him as to what
to do.
The appearance to whole people of Israel, when they fled
from Egypt: And the Lord went before them by day in a pillar of a
cloud, … and by night in a pillar of fire, to give them light (Ex.
13:21).
This was not the Lord Himself but His angel. Moses
confirms that: When we cried unto the Lord, He heard our voice, and
sent an angel, and hath brought us forth out of Egypt (Num. 20:16).
Here, as somewhere else, the angel is identified with the Lord, God.
For My name is in him, says the Lord God (cf. Ex. 23:2021).
To
Gideon an angel appeared as an ordinary man, just as the Archangel
Raphael appeared to Tobias. Gideon understood that it was an angel only
he saw a miracle performed by his unknown visitor. Then he exclaimed:
Alas, O Lord God! For I have seen an angel of the Lord face to face
(Judges 6:12_23).
To the wife of Manoah, who was barren and
childless, an angel appeared with the news that she would have a son,
Samson by name. Recounting this event to her husband, she said: A man
of God came unto me, and his countenance was like the countenance of an
angel of God, very terrible (Judges 13:6).
When the Syrians
surrounded the place where the prophet Elisha lived, his frightened
servant exclaimed: Alas, how shall we do? And Elisha answered: Fear
not, for they that be with us are more then they that be with them.
And
by the prayers of Elisha, the Lord opened the eyes of the young man;
and the he saw: and, behold, the mountain was full of horses and
chariots of fire around about Elisha (II Kings 6:16_17). Of course,
that was the host of God's angels sent to protect the righteous man.
To
the prophet Ezekiel the angel was as the appearance of fire: from his
loins even downward, fire: and from his loins even upward, as
appearance of brightness, as the color of amber (Ezekiel 8:2).
The
great prophet Daniel saw an angel as a certain man clothed in linen,
whose loins were girded with fine gold of Uphaz. His body also was like
the beryl and his face as the appearance of lightning, and his eyes as
lamps of fire, and his arms and his feet like in color to polished
brass, and the voice of his words like the voice of a multitude. So
much was Daniel frightened that he says: Therefore I was left alone …
and there remained no strength in me … and I retained no strength (Dan.
10:8). It was Archangel Gabriel (Dan. 8:16).
The same Gabriel
appeared to Zacharias, the father of St. John the Baptist. And though
his appearance was not so terrifying as that which Daniel saw, yet
Zacharias, when he saw him, was troubled and fear fell upon him. And
the angel said unto him: Fear not, Zacharias! (Luke 1:12_13).
As
to the appearance of Gabriel to the Virgin Mary at Nazareth, we presume
that the appearing was in a gentle human form, unlike those terrifying
forms in which the angels appeared to the prophets of old. Yet, Mary
was frightened and troubled. No wonder, for not only in extraordinary
appearance frightens us, but also the suddenness of it. The angel
therefore encouraged the Holy Virgin by saying: Fear not, Mary! (Luke
1:29030).
When our Lord Jesus was born, an angel appeared to the
shepherds at Bethlehem. And, lo, the angel of the Lord came upon them,
and the glory of the Lord shone round about them: and they were sore
afraid. And the angel said unto them: Fear not (Matt. 28:3_5).
The
myrrh bearing women at the sepulcher of the risen Lord saw an angel:
His countenance was like lightning, and his raiment white as snow: And
for fear of him the keepers (of the tomb) did shake, and became as dead
men. To the women, however, the angel said: Fear not ye! (Matt. 28:3_5).
In
no other sacred book is so much written about angels as in the Book of
Revelation. St. John saw a multitude around the throne of the Highest.
He describes them as clad in pure and white linen, having their breasts
girded with golden girdles (Rev. 15:6). Very striking is the
description of one of them: I saw, says John, another mighty angel came
down from heaven, clothed with a cloud: and a rainbow was upon his
head, and his face was as it were the sun, and his feet as pillars of
fire … And he cried with a loud voice, as when a lion roareth (Rev. 10:
1, 3).
Clothed with a cloud! Remember what the Lord Jesus said
about His Second Coming: Then, said He, shall all the tribes of the
earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of
heaven with power and great glory (Matt. 24:30). Thus, the clouds of
heaven mean multitudes of angels.
All the appearances of angels
are just appearances, not pertaining to their nature; they are pure
spirits, and all their power and beauty is spiritual, not material. As
our sacred poet says of them: "The material and intelligent angels hast
Thou created, O Lord, before the visible world; They ceaselessly cry
unto Thee over there: Bless the Lord all ye works of the Lord. Sing
unto Him great praises forever." (Octoechos Matins, Hymn 8, tone 3).
The
angels of the Lord do not want to be worshiped. When an angel showed
St. John the new Paradise in Heaven with all its marvels, St. John fell
at the feet of the angel to worship him. But the angel did not allow
that, saying: Do it not, for I am thy fellow servant, and of thy
brethren the prophets, and of them which keep the sayings of this book:
worship God (Rev. 22:8_9). Yea, we worship God alone.
The Activity of the Angels
The
activity of the angels is twofold: in Heaven to glorify God, and on
earth to carry out God's orders concerning men. The word "angel" itself
means herald or messenger. They rest not, day and night, saying: Holy,
holy, Lord God Almighty which was, and is, and is to come, writes a
seer (Rev. 4:8). And another writes of the ministering spirits, sent
forth to minister for them who shall be heirs of salvation (Heb. 1:14).
Says
St. Gregory the Theologian: "Some of those intelligences are standing
before the great God, and others cooperate in holding the whole world."
And Damascene: "They are powerful, and ready to accomplish the will of
God, and they appear anywhere and instantly, according to their subtle
nature, wherever God orders them."
The first time that an angel,
a cherub, is mentioned in the Bible is when Adam and Eve are ousted
from the Garden of Eden (earthly Paradise). Then God placed cherubim's
_ and a flaming sword, which turned every way, to keep the way of the
tree of life (Gen. 3:24).
A. We may consider the angels, in the
first place, as messengers of good news. Twice there appeared an angel
to Hagar, Abraham's handmaid, consoling her because her mistress. Sarah
dealt harshly with her. "Behold, said the angels, thou art with child,
and shalt bear a son, and shalt call his name Ishmael; because the Lord
hath heard Thine affliction (Gen. 16:7; cf. Gen. 21:17). Ishmael became
the progenitor of the Ishmaelites; Arabs, who are also called Hagarenes.
Three
angels appeared in the plains of Mamre with a message to childless
Abraham, that he shall have a son, which indeed happened the next year
(Gen. 18: 10). Thus Isaac, the progenitor of the Jews, was born.
When
Abraham was ready to sacrifice his only son Isaac, according to the
order of God who wanted to test his fidelity, an angel of Heaven
prevented him from doing so. Said the angel: Now I know that thou
fearest God (Gen. 22:12). God Himself, however, later offered His only
Son Jesus Christ, to be slain like a lamb to save us (Eph. 5:2).
B.
The angels of God save the men of God. In the corrupt city of Sodom
there lived a man of God, Lot. When Sodom was doomed to destruction,
God sent two angels to save Lot and his family (Gen. 19:1_22).
An
angel saved Jacob from the revenge of his brother Essau (Gen. 32:1).
And before his death Jacob spoke of the Angel which redeemed me from
all evil (Gen. 48:16).
An Angel saved the three youths in
Babylon from death in the midst of the burning fiery furnace, into
which they were thrown, because they renounced the worship of idols in
place of the only true God (Dan. 3:12_30). Every Matins service we are
reminded of this strange event by the seventh and eighth irmoi of the
canons. And angel saved Daniel from the den of lions into which he was
put on account of his strong faith in the one God. The lions, however,
behaved as lambs. To the astonished King Darius, Daniel said: My God
hath sent His angel, and hath shut the lions mouths, that they have not
hurt me, forasmuch as before Him innocence was found in me (Dan.
6:16_23).
C. The angels are executors of God's judgments. We
quote only a few instances: The city of Sodom was wallowing in most
horrible vices (homosexuality, sodomy). The Lord sent two angels to
save the only righteous man in Sodom, Lot. They came to Lot and urged
him to get out of that city, for the Lord sent us to destroy it. And
they razed Sodom and Gomorrah to ashes, by brimstone and fire from the
Lord out of Heaven (Gen. 19:12_25). King David, otherwise a great
glorifier of God, sinned once against the Lord God, and God sent an
angel with a drawn sword in his hand _ and there fell of Israel seventy
thousand men, until David repented and cried to God for mercy (I Chron.
21:1_17). Sennacherib, King of Assyria, beleaguered Jerusalem with a
mighty army. He and his dukes blasphemed the Lord God, called King
Hezekiah and his people to surrender. But after Hezekiah prostrated
before God and prayed in the temple, the angel of the Lord went forth
and smote in the camp of Assyrians a hundred and four scores and five
thousand. King Sennacherib fled to Nineveh, where he was killed by his
sons (Isaiah, chapters 36 & 37). The inspired Psalmist, knowing
from history and from his own experience the part which the angels play
in the life of a man or of a nation, speaks: The angel of the Lord will
encamp round about them that fear Him, and will deliver them (Ps.
33:7). No evils shall come nigh thee, and no scourge shall come nigh
unto thy dwelling. For He shall give His angels charge over thee, to
keep thee in all thy ways. On their hands shall they bear thee up, lest
at any time thou dash thy foot against a stone (Ps. 90:10_12). Bless
the Lord, he His angels, mighty in strength, that perform His word, to
hear the voice of His words (Ps. 103:20).
The Guardian Angels
By
the above words the Psalmist confirms the common belief that angels
protect and help both nations and individuals. In ancient times,
Michael the Archangel was considered as the guardian angel of the
people of Israel. Joshua saw him at Jericho, and heard him saying that
he was the captain of the Lord's host (Joshua 5:14_15). And to Daniel,
the Archangel Gabriel spoke of the Archangel Michael, saying: At that
time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the
children of thy people (Dan. 12:1). The Apostle Jude writes of Michael
the Archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the
holy of Moses (Jude 9). As guardian of the people, he was also the
guardian even of the dead body of their leader Moses. The Fathers of
the Church taught that there are guardian angels of nations, countries,
churches, as well as of individuals (Rev. 2). Yea, even of elements,
stars and planets. St. John of the "Ladder" testifies of his personal
guardian angel: "Whenever I was longing for a greater advancement in
spiritual life, the angel appeared in such a case and enlightened me."
And
here is what St. Basil the Great says: "The angel will not retreat from
us, unless we drive him away by our evil deeds. As the smoke drives
bees away, and stench the doves, even so our stinking sin drives away
from us the angel who protects our life."
Concerning the
guardian angels of children, and all childlike persons, we shall hear
later from the mouth of the Lord Jesus Himself.
Angels: Servants of Christ's Church
The
New Testament is full of angels: They were hovering around Christ as
their Creator, Lover and Lord from the beginning of His Incarnation,
always ready to serve Him. They worshiped Him on earth as they
worshiped Him in Heaven, and they loved Him on His Cross as they love
Him in His Heavenly glory, with a glowing transcendent love. With
gladness and attentiveness they supported His work, that is, His Church
on earth. They are doing so now, and will do so until the end of the
world. When He was born in a poor stony cave, there appeared a
multitude of the heavenly host praising God (Luke 2:13). After the
temptation in the desert, when the devil left Him, behold, angles came
and ministered unto Him Matt. 4:11). Our genial artists were right in
painting many angels around Christ, as at His baptism when the Heavens
were opened unto Him, at the Transfiguration, around His Crucifixion,
at the descent into Hades, at the Resurrection and at His Ascension.
Whenever there appeared an archangel, or another angel, we can suppose
that behind him there was a company of many angels, though invisible to
human eyes. We do not think that the Archangel Gabriel was alone when
he announced to the Virgin Mary the world_shaking news of the birth of
Messiah; nor that the angel who appeared in Gethsemane to strengthen
Christ in His agony, was without a company of many invisible angels.
Wherever the King is, His soldiers are also there at hand.
Whom
Christ loves, His angels love too. He loved children, and ordered His
angels to be their guardians. Said He: The angels do always behold the
face of my Father, which is in heaven (Matt. 18:10). He even identified
Himself with little children saying: Whoso shall receive one such
little child in My name receiveth Me (Matt. 18:5). He threatened
terribly those who mislead, scandalize and cause children to sin. It
were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and
that he were drowned in the depth of the sea (Matt. 18:6). He also
said: Suffer little children to come unto Me for of such is the kingdom
of heaven (Matt. 19:14). (This is the very foundation of Christian
education, that is, to let children come unto Christ). This is the
reason the angels love and protect children. A spiritual poet says:
Angels and ministers, spirits of grace, Friends of the children, beholding God's face, Moving like thought to us through the beyond, Molded in beauty, and free from our bond. (P. Dearmer, English Hymnal)
The
angels also ministered to the apostles and others of the faithful from
the beginning, and throughout the history of the Church.
When
the high priests put the apostles in prison, the Angel of the Lord
opened the prison doors by night and brought them forth, saying: Go,
stand and speak in the temple to the people all of the words of this
life (Acts 5:17_20; 12:7_10).
When Herod, the kinglet of
Galilee, persecuted the Church, killed the apostle James, and intended
to kill Peter too, then immediately the Angel of the Lord smote him-and
he was eaten of worms, and gave up the ghost (Acts 12:23).
When
Philip was preaching in Samaria, an angel directed him toward Gaza to
meet a man of Ethiopia, a eunuch of great authority under Candace,
Queen of Ethiopia. Philip taught him of Jesus the Messiah, and baptized
him. That eunuch was the first Christian of his country. Thus, the
angels helped the apostles in spreading the Gospel to distant countries
(Acts 8:26).
A Roman officer, Cornelius, while praying at about
three o'clock on a sunny afternoon, saw in a vision an angel of God,
who advised him to call Peter from Joppa. After Peter's instruction
Cornelius was baptized, along with his whole household. In this case
too, the angel of the Lord promoted the growth of the Church among the
pagans (Acts, chapter 10). While St. Paul was sailing to Rome with 276
souls, a terrible storm threatened to engulf the ship. Fear not, Paul,
thou must be brought before Caesar, and lo, God has given thee all them
that sail with thee, which indeed happened (Acts 27:20_25).
Angels: God's Harvesters
In
His parable of the sower and the seed, the Lord Jesus explained: The
field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but
the tares are the children of the wicked one; The enemy that sowed them
is the devil; the harvest is the end of the world; and the reapers are
the angels…… The Son of man shall send forth His angels, and they shall
gather out of His Kingdom all things that offend, and them which do
iniquity; and shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be
wailing and gnashing of teeth. Then shall the righteous shine forth as
the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Who hath ears to hear, let him
hear (Matt. 13:38_43). But before the end of the world the end of many
of us will have already come. Lo, when poor Lazarus died, angels into
Abraham's bosom carried his soul; and when merciless Dives died, his
soul dropped into hell (Luke 16:19_23). Remember then, O man that your
end is for you the end of the world. For at your death you shall be
either the harvest of angels or of the wicked one. It is a good thing
to trust in God's mercy, but to trust in God and to go on sinning
without repentance is to mock God. Here is what our Savior says: I say
unto you, there is joy in the presence of the angels of God over one
sinner that repenteth (Luke 15:10). But woe unto them that die in sins
without repentance. Here is the stern warning of a great apostle: God
spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell ……and
spared not the old world, but saved Noah bringing in the flood upon the
world of the ungodly; and turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah into
ashes (II Pet. 2:4_6). Much less will He spare those who are Christians
by name, but in reality are servants of the devil in the words and
deeds. Like Judas, they might sometime repent but it will be too late.
For the Son of man shall come in the glory of the Father with His
angels, and then He shall reward every man according to his works
(Matt. 16:27).
-----
The Whole World Is Deceived
Rev 12:9 "Whole inhabited earth deceived."
And
the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and
Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth,
and his angels were cast out with him. (Revelation 12:9)
Rev.
12:9 says that Satan is deceiving "the whole world." Not part of it;
but all of it, which means the everyone at one time or another has been
deceived. Only the Elect in the final end time, which is not far
distant in time from us as we speak...ONLY THE ELECT WILL ESCAPE the
final deceptions which will come upon this entire inhabited earth, as
we read in Mt. 24:24, which says, "For there shall arise false Christs,
and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch
that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect."
Certainly
God is inviting some who are now deceived out of darkness into light in
Rev. 18:4, "Come out of her, my people," the Spirit says to God's
Children who are now deceived, of course chosen only if they are
willing to heed God's call. So, those who at some point choose to
comply with God's will are His elect or chosen. Mt. 20:16 "for many be
called, but few chosen."
By what or by whom are God's professed
people being deceived? The answer itself is shocking enough but we have
already been warned that Satan performs his evil works through human
agents, (2 Cor 11:14)
Satan, posing as an angel of light through
his agents who are serving him, most of them without realizing it at
this time. And then we have denominations, colleges, foundations,
churches, small and great, as well as great institutions and powerful
governments being used as instruments of deception. So, the deceptions
are ongoing and many. But in the midst of such a terrible situation,
God's servants have been chosen as instruments of light and truth to
shine His glory into a world walking and stumbling in darkness. His
agents do good works like Jesus, Acts 10:38.
For now lets talk
about some deceptions that have been perpetuated by organized religion
from the very beginning of the Biblical account. Religious
organizations that have been deceived have an opportunity and are
invited to step out of darkness into light and be God's agents
(messengers) of truth, rather than Satan's minions of deceit. We will
also learn from God's words where His People of Israel really are and
which great presumed invincible world power may soon cease to exist.
[The author here is referring to the greatest nation on earth today. And everyone knows who that is. Enough said].
I
am not certain when, but have reason to believe that it looms
menacingly on the horizon. We will consider the abomination of
desolation spoken of by Daniel the prophet, and what John may have seen
in the vision that inspired him to write Rev. 9:19. We will locate and
identify the Rev. 12:1 woman clothed with the sun with "the moon under
her feet," and more.
The Second Coming of Christ
Christ's
second Coming will be most glorious and most dramatic. While at His
first coming "a multitude" of angels appeared to the shepherds of
Bethlehem, at His second coming all the holy angels shall accompany
Him. Then He shall send His angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and
they shall gather His elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven
to the other (Matt. 24:31). Then shall the righteous shine forth as the
sun in the Kingdom of their Father (Matt. 13:43). Thus, the angels
shall be the reapers of God's harvest.
But the most striking
reward Christ ever promised to the elect and righteous ones, who lived
according to and suffered for His Gospel on earth, was that they shall
be equal to the angels. To the sophistic Sadducees, He said: They,
which shall be accounted worthy to obtain that world, and the
resurrection from the dead, neither marry nor are given in marriage.
Neither can they die any more: for they are equal unto the angels, and
are the children of God, being the children of the resurrection (Luke
20:35_36). Reading these words, we are filled with awe and fear. How
can we be equal to angels? Behold, it is written of the angels: God
stood in the congregation of the gods, in the midst He shall stand out
among gods. And a little further on: Ye are gods, and all of you the
sons of the Most High (Ps. 81: 1,6). Of course, the angels are called
gods, not by their divine nature but their close contact with God. How
can men be equal to them? And here is what our sacred poet says of
angels:
Adorned with shining beauty All the angels of the Pantocrator Approach the inexpressible glory of Christ Singing to Him day and night: Blessed art Thou, O God, forever. (Theophane _Matins hymn, tone 6).
How
can we be equal unto the angels, the glorifiers of Christ, we, who are
blaspheming Him daily by our sins? First of all, Christ speaks of those
who shall be accounted worthy, and, secondly, by the love of Christ
which passeth all understanding (cf Luke 20:35; Eph. 3:19; Phil. 4:7).
Let
us then humble ourselves, and listen to what a seer of heavenly
mysteries says: Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered
into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that
love Him (I Cor. 2:9). Here is the key to the mystery: those who love
God, be they angels or human beings, are equal before God.
In this sense also we call the angels our elder brethren, honoring them and praying to them from this valley of tears:
"O Holy Archangels and Angels, Pray to God for us sinners.!"
Source:
The Lord's Prayer A Devout Interpretation & Three Lessons of the
Orthodox Church by St. Nicholai Velimirovic, St. Paisius
Sabbath
Queen...Jews had her as the "Sabbath Queen." Shekinah ... also called a
Shining glistening light...a blinding light. A feminine
being with silver wings ... Merkabah 4... "The Sabbath Queen"...
$12.00. Barnes & Nobel Why don't the Jews know who she really is...because they rejected Jesus.
Everywhere it said Yashua (Son) they changed it to Yahweh.
El Shaddai __ Holy Spirit.
They know there is a Shekinah Glory...they know she is the Dove....
Dr. Gene Scott referred to Mother & Father God.
At that time Lois Roden was sending her messages out to all Protestant ministers.
Dr Gene Scott. The Kingdom House...broadcasted out of Hollywood, Cal.
Mellissa Scott still broadcasts....goes into the grammar of the Hebrew.
-----
"The Sabbath." Abraham Joshua Heschel.
ISBN 0_374_52975_2
More important info on our God Family....who are coming to receive us home soon....
Your comments and ideas are welcome...please read all of this through.
This
is the closest I have been able to come to the difference in the Greek
between Holy Ghost and Holy Spirit. If anyone has any comments or ideas
please let me know....this is a great question. Is the "Holy Ghost"
meant to designate a person? And if that phrase is meant then who is
that person? Who actually is "The Holy Ghost?"
We now know that the Holy Ghost is in the Feminine as is the phrase "Holy Spirit." Both are in the feminine.
And the Holy Ghost is on center stage with Holy Spirit making only 4 appearances.
If
the Holy Ghost is feminine...a female entity, then she is not Jesus.
And if Jesus has a "Spirit" .... because He says, "My Spirit," at
times....then who is that "Spirit?" Would it be the same entity as in
Rev 1:1..."My angel?"
There is a great mystery here and I have
wanted to try and figure it out for a long time. This is the closest I
have been able to come so far.
I heard a study on audio tape
which explained that the word "spirit" in the Greek means "Mind" but
Soul has to do with the feelings or emotions. Body, soul & spirit
is referring to the physical, the emotions and the Mind, in that order.
So,
if Jesus has a sister spouse (i.e. a wife) as from Song of Solomon "My
sister, My spouse" then is this "Holy Ghost" His spouse who by Divine
fiat now has been given the authority and power to manifest herself in
creation for the first time since the fall?
If Dan 10:21 is a
revelation of who Gabrielle & Michael really are....i.e. Husband
& Wife and the real Creators of the human race or mankind....then
we have a most important revelation here of the break through that
Jesus' death on the cross won for the human race....i.e. the
opportunity to be filled with the actual Spirit of their true
mother....to experience the joy of Her full Presence in their lives
since the fall. Could this actually be true? And was this truth
lost and buried with the first generation of Christians and the passing
off of the scene of the Greek language which was phased out, eclipsed
by Latin?
Did the early Christian experience in their soul their
true Mother and Father without realizing it in their minds? That is
intellectually....that this experience of actually knowing mentally/
intellectually as well as in our emotions who are true Mother &
Daddy really are is now open to humanity....and is in fact necessary to
know and realize this to the fullest extent and capacity of our being
in order to be Transformed and then Translated?
That is level
#7. Level #6 is even now being revealed...i.e. the Revelation of the
Female image of God which is this "Holy Ghost." In the OT she was
called "Wisdom" but in the NT she is the "Holy Ghost."
The word
"Transformed" is used only one time in a positive connotation in Rom
12:2. "I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that
you present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable to God,
which is your reasonable service. And do not be conformed to this
world, but be transformed by the renewing of your MIND (Spirit), that
you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God."
Beloved,
this may be the break through that is needed so that we can be
Transformed into the likeness of Jesus & Gabrielle...Michael &
Gabrielle.
In the OT Jesus was Michael and in the NT He is Jesus Christ the anointed Savior....Yashua in the Hebrew.
In
Proverbs 30 the author....Solomon or someone he is quoting admitted
that he was stupid and did not have understanding...had not learned
wisdom or about Wisdom...His real mother. "Nor have the knowledge of
the Holy One." Prov 30:3. So, he is being very honest here. Solomon had
more head knowledge than anyone but did not have heart knowledge or
Wisdom to go along with all the facts and figures in his brain.
"Who
has ascended into heaven or descended? Who has gathered the wind in His
fists? Who has bound the waters in a garment? Who has established all
the ends of the earth? /////
"WHAT IS HIS NAME, AND WHAT IS HIS SON'S NAME, IF YOU KNOW?" Prov. 30:4.
And that is all he says about that.
But in those short 4 verses he revealed that there is a Father & A Son....and Psalm 2 also speaks of this.
Gen
1:26, 27 and Gen 5:1 reveals a plurality of Gods who were involved in
the Creation ... But the god of this world has blinded the minds of
humanity up until now.
May the Lord help us to pray earnestly so
we can comprehend and truly know all there is to know about the God
family so we can join it soon when they come to receive us home to
heaven.
Amen.
Your friend,
Pastor Mike
Isn't Jesus Wonderful!
----- Pneuma
hagion, or to Pneuma to hagion, occurs ninety_four times in the New
Testament. Ninety times they translated it Holy Ghost, and four times
Holy Spirit. Curiosity is inquisitive to find some reason for these
four exceptions. They are found Luke xi. 13; Eph. i. 13; iv. 30; I
Thess. iv. 8. In Luke xi. 13 there is no article__it simply reads,
"Give a holy spirit to them that ask him." They did not say, "Give a
holy ghost." Why? Is it because there is no article? We shall examine
the other passages and see whether they are uniform in this. Eph. i.
13; iv. 30, and I. Thess. iv. 8 the article is found. Besides, in many
other places, where the article is not found, they have Holy Ghost. Is
it because what Luke calls "Holy Ghost," Matthew, in quoting the same
passage of Christ's discourse (chap. vii. 11), uses "good things?"
Probably it was; for they seem to use "Holy Ghost" as if by it a person
was always intended; at least, this will apply to the New Testament:
for we have seen they have no Holy Ghost in the Old Testament.
But
then it will be asked, Are they uniform in this? Is not their Holy
Ghost meant Eph. i. 13 and iv. 30 and I. Thess. iv. 8? It would appear
so. But the construction is peculiar in Eph. i. 13, for the arrangement
is, "You are sealed by the spirit of the promise, the holy:" and as the
King's translators promised only the Holy [122] Spirit in the Old
Testament, and not the Holy Ghost, they could not with propriety speak
of a promised Holy Ghost: for in chap. iv. 30 they seem to have their
eyes turned back to Isa. lxiii. 11, where they rendered it, "Grieve his
Holy Spirit," and therefore they can not say, "Grieve not the Holy
Ghost of God," the figure in Isa. lxiii. 10, 11, being the same found
in Eph. iv. 30. They prefer to agree with themselves in the Old
Testament, rather than with themselves in the New. And in the last
place (I. Thess. iv. 8) we can find no reason, except that they found
it incongruous to use Holy Ghost in reference to God himself__"Who has
given to us his Holy Spirit," rather than his Holy Ghost. This is, in
all candor, all we can say in their defense. There is, therefore, no
good reason for preferring Ghost to Spirit ninety times to four in the
New Testament.
-----
Even when the Spirit of God is
spoken of, it does not always mean the same thing. The Spirit of God
sometimes unequivocally means the breath of natural life. Thus in Job
xxvii. 3, "The Spirit of God is in my nostrils, all the while the
breath is in me." The four winds are in the same metaphor, called the
four spirits of the heavens. (Zech. vi. 5.) The Spirit of God moving
upon the face of the great deep, may also be a figurative expression;
for the Hebrews were accustomed to express their superlative comparison
by adding the word God as an adjective to a noun. Thus "the cedars of
God," "the hills of God," "the mountains of God," were very lofty
cedars, hills and mountains. However this may be, we find the phrase
does not always mean the same thing.
Benjamin Lyon Smith The Millennial Harbinger Abridged (1902) EARNEST OF THE SPIRIT.
Having
ascertained the Scriptural import of the following words and phrases,
"gift of the Holy Spirit," "spiritual gifts," "the Spirit by measure,"
"distribution of the Spirit," "demonstration of the Spirit,"
"manifestation of the Spirit"__we proceed to the examination of some
other apostolic phrases relative to the same subject. The phrase
"earnest of the Spirit" next deserves our attention. [115]
If
the reader has some preconceived system in his mind which he desires to
see established by these examinations, I think it is probable he will
be disappointed; for we are not seeking to establish any. We prosecute
this inquiry as if we had never written nor spoken one word upon the
subject. We are taking a new course of examination, and if it result as
did our former inquiries by another process, it will be then
confirmatory of the views already offered; just as if the working of a
question by the Rule of Three should give the same result as already
ascertained by the Rule of Practice, it establishes the certainty of
the former solution; but if it should give a different result, then it
must call for a reconsideration of the matter. The reader, then, if he
do justice to himself, will place himself in the same circumstances as
the writer, and, with the candor and docility of a student, open the
Living Oracles, and ask, What say the Scriptures?
Arrabon, the
word translated earnest in the phrase before us, found II. Cor. i. 22,
occurs only in two other passages; viz.: II. Cor. v. 5; Eph. i. 14. It
is a Hebrew word adopted into the Greek language of the New Testament,
as the word baptism is a Greek ward adopted into the English New
Testament. It is translated usually pledge, earnest. In the common and
in the new version, this word is always rendered earnest. The ancient
Hebrew and Phoenician word is a commercial term, and indicates that
part of the price of any article which was given in hand at the time of
purchase. The goods were marked or sealed, and a sum in hand paid, when
the purchase was made; hence the Hebrew verb from which it is derived
signifies to make sure, or to become surety. It is found three times
only in the translation of the Seventy, and always adopted as in the
New Testament, from which writings doubtless the Apostles had it.
Before
we attempt to ascertain the precise import of this phrase, there is a
word which occurs in the same connection with it, both in the Epistles
to the Corinthians and Ephesians, which must be distinctly understood
antecedent to a full intelligence of "the earnest of the Spirit." It is
the word sealed. "God," says Paul, "has anointed us Apostles"__"Christ
establishes us, God anoints us, and has also sealed us, and given the
earnest of the Spirit in our hearts" (II. Cor. i. 21, 22). And Eph. i.
13, 14, speaking of the Ephesian converts in the second person,
contrasted with the Jewish converts who before expected the Messiah,
Paul says, "Having believed, you were sealed with the Spirit of the
promise, the Holy Spirit [the promised Spirit], who is the earnest of
our inheritance, for the redemption of the purchase to the praise of
his glory."
The reader now perceives the intimacy between God's
anointing, sealing, and giving of the earnest of the Spirit, and feels
the importance of understanding the terms sealed, anointed, as well as
the term [116] earnest. We shall therefore attend to them in order; and
first, to the word seal: Sphragis (seal) occurs in the New Testament
sixteen times. Of these, thirteen are in the Apocalypse; and always
denote a public mark or external sign, such as the seal upon a letter.
The instrument by which a visible mark or impression is made is
literally a seal. This seal has an inscription upon it; and therefore
we have the instrument, the inscription, and the impression made by it,
all denominated "seal." They are, however, all visible. The instrument,
the inscription, and the impression on the wax or on the paper, are
called seals. Metaphorically it denotes secrecy, and is so used in the
Apocalypse. It also imports confirmation.
Let us now examine all
the places in which it occurs. Rev. v. 5, "Seven seals"__visible
impressions or marks indicative of security and secrecy. It is found
chap. v. 1, 2, 5, 9, and chap. vi. 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12; viii. 1__eleven
times in this sense: chap. vii. it denotes the instrument by which
impressions are made; chap. viii. 1. and chap. ix. 4, the impression
made on the forehead; II. Tim. ii. 19, it seems to be used for the
inscription on the seal; and Rom. iv. 11 it denotes a confirmatory
mark. Circumcision was in the person of Abraham a seal or confirmation
of the faith he had in uncircumcision. It is only found once more (I.
Cor. ix. 2), "For the seal of my apostleship you are in the Lord." The
converted Corinthians were a confirmation of Paul's apostleship. From
this comes the verb,
To seal (sphragizo), which occurs seventeen
times. Ten of these are found in the Revelation in the sense above
defined__Rev. vii. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8; x. 4; xx. 3; xxii. 10; Matt.
xxvii. 66, it is applied to the stone on the sepulcher. John vi. 27,
God has sealed his Son, confirmed his mission by the Holy Spirit
without measure. Rom. xv. 28, metaphorically, to secure. The remaining
passages bear upon the subject directly, and are found Eph. i. 13 and
iv. 30, in the sense applied to Jesus, John vi. 27. God sealed his Son
by the manifestations of his Spirit. The Apostles were sealed as his
ambassadors by the same Spirit; and the converts from among the Jews
and Gentiles were also sealed as God's people by the manifestations of
the same Spirit.
To give a ring with an inscription, or to give
a seal, indicated in all ages of the world the conferring of an office.
Pharaoh gave Joseph a ring (Gen. xli. 42) when he made him governor. A
similar example is found Esth. viii. 2; iii. 10. The Lord Chancellor of
England, Lord Keeper of the Great Seal, Lord of the Privy Seal, and the
Secretaries of State receive their office by the king's delivering to
them the seals of their respective offices.
The seal of the
Spirit was then a public sign, mark, or pledge that God had sent his
Son__that Jesus had sent the Apostles; and on their [117] converts it
was a sign or a pledge that God had received them as his people. Every
"manifestation of the Spirit" was a confirmation of the mission of the
Apostles, a seal of their apostleship. The spiritual gifts bestowed
upon the converts by the hands of the Apostles, was a seal of the
apostleship of the persons who conferred them, and it was also a pledge
that God had received the persons sealed as his property.
Connected
with sealing is the figure of anointing: for kings, and prophets, and
priests, on receiving their office, or on being sealed, were also
anointed with oil. The pouring of oil upon the head was a literal
anointing; but figuratively, the bestowing of the Holy Spirit, or some
spiritual gifts, is the anointing spoken of in the New Testament. An
examination of all the places where it is found makes this
unquestionable. The word chrio (to anoint) is only found five times in
the apostolic writings: Luke iv. 18; Acts iv. 27; x. 38; 11. Cor. i.
21; Heb. i. 9. It is four times applied to Jesus, and once only to the
Apostles; and certainly alludes to "the gift of the Holy Spirit" in the
ascertained sense of that phrase. Luke iv. 18, "The Spirit of the Lord
is upon me," says Jesus, "because he has anointed me to preach the
gospel." Acts iv. 27, "Against thy holy Son Jesus, whom thou hast
anointed." Acts x. 38, "How God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the
Holy Spirit and with power." This explains the matter fully. Heb. i. 9,
"God has anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows"__his
other public servants. The oil is the ointment or anointing, called the
chrisma, found only in John's Letter, ii. 27__the gift of the
Spirit__"The anointing teaches you all things." The remaining passage
is II. Cor. i. 22, and is connected with the seal and the earnest: "God
has anointed us, sealed us, and given the earnest of the Spirit in our
hearts." As "the Holy Spirit and power" are not two things, neither is
the anointing and the seal. "God anointed and sealed us" (Apostles) are
not two distinct acts, but the same act presented under two figures.
Those
who regard John the Baptist as pouring water upon the Messiah call that
his anointing, or christening; and therefore those who sprinkle water
upon the head of infants formerly called it christening, from the Greek
word chrisas, which signifies anointing!
The oil, the pouring of
the oil, and the head on which it was poured, are all external and
visible. Hence the Holy Spirit descended on the head of the Messiah
visibly, and sat upon the head of the Apostles in the resemblances of
fiery tongues. Thus were Jesus and the Apostles anointed.
There
is, however, a difference in meaning between the word anointing and the
oil, and between the oil and its effects. Oil had sensible effects upon
the person. Hence, as the emblem of the gift of the Holy Spirit
bestowed on Jesus, it is called "the oil of gladness." Joy in the
heart, arising from consecration to the Lord, was the natural [118]
effect of this anointing. This joy in the heart is a prelude of the
fullness of joy, an earnest of the inheritance. This brings us within
sight of the meaning of the association of the anointing, the seal, and
the earnest.
A seal and an earnest are not the same thing,
though the same thing may be both a seal and an earnest. Anointing and
sealing are not the same act, though the same act may be both an
anointing and sealing. A sign and a seal are not the same thing; yet
circumcision to Abraham was both a sign and a seal. There is this
difference between a seal and an earnest: they are the same so far as
an assurance is concerned; but the seal assures of an inheritance
without being any part of it: whereas an earnest assures us of an
inheritance, and is a part of the inheritance itself. A seal may be a
pledge to others, but an earnest is a pledge to ourselves.
The
seal of the Holy Spirit, as explained by Paul (Eph. 1. 13), is the
earnest of the inheritance until the full possession of it. The seal
may be upon my head, but the earnest is in the head and in the heart.
If the head be anointed, the whole person is perfumed with its graces.
The oil poured on the head of Aaron descended in its perfumes and
influences to the tuft of his robe. The heart was always filled with
joy when the head was anointed. All the members of Christ's body are
anointed with him, and all experience the joy of that unction in their
hearts; and this to them is an earnest, an assurance of the Dullness of
joy. But to this subject we can not do full justice till we have
examined "the fruits of the Spirit." Thus
far we have progressed__God anointed and sealed his Son and the
Apostles by his Spirit, and sealed the converts made by their ministry
as his people, by various manifestations of his Spirit; and these
manifestations filled the heart with the fruits of God's Spirit. which
constituted an earnest in their hearts of the full fruition of the
heavenly inheritance.
The argument or assurance which the
earnest of the Spirit in the saints gives, is thus expressed: "if the
Spirit of him who raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in us, he who
raised up Christ from the dead will make even our mortal bodies alive
through his Spirit who dwells in us."
Before we speak of "the
fruit of the Spirit," and of "the first fruits of the Spirit," we think
it necessary to extend our vision, and bring into our horizon what is
spoken about the Spirit in the ages of the world antecedent to the
Christian economy. We shall, therefore, glance through the ancient
oracles.
There is not in the Jewish and Christian Scriptures a
word of more diversified occurrence and of greater variety of meaning,
than the word spirit. It occurs very often without any epithet, and we
find it [119] in the following connections: Holy Spirit, Spirit of God,
Spirit of Christ, Spirit of the Lord, Spirit of the Lord God, Spirit of
adoption, Spirit of antichrist, Spirit of the Arabians, Spirit of
bondage, Spirit of burning, Spirit of counsel, Spirit of divination,
Spirit of Egypt, Spirit of error, Spirit of fear, Spirit of fear of the
Lord, Spirit of glory, Spirit of grace, Spirit of jealousy, Spirit of
judgment, Spirit of infirmity, Spirit of knowledge, Spirit of
heaviness, Spirit of holiness, Spirit of life, Spirit of meekness,
Spirit of might, Spirit of your mind, Spirit of the Philistines, Spirit
of promise, Spirit of prophecy, Spirit of slumber, Spirit of his Son,
Spirit of truth, Spirit of understanding, Spirit of whoredoms, Spirit
of wisdom.
We have also another class of combinations of this
word; such as broken spirit, dumb spirit, evil spirit, free spirit,
foul spirit, faithful spirit, good spirit, humble spirit, meek spirit,
new spirit, patient spirit, perverse spirit, quickening spirit, quiet
spirit, sorrowful spirit, unclean spirit, wounded spirit.
Add to
these the phrases, Born of the Spirit, Earnest of the Spirit, Fruit of
the Spirit, First Fruits of the Spirit, Newness of Spirit, Love of the
Spirit, Mind of the Spirit, Sword of the Spirit, Demonstration of the
Spirit, Manifestation of the Spirit, Ministration of the Spirit,
Sanctification of the Spirit, Grieve not the Holy Spirit, Quench not
the Spirit, Resist the Holy Spirit, Blaspheme the Holy Spirit.
Cruden,
in his Concordance, ascribes nineteen different acceptations or
significations to the word Spirit as found in both Testaments. Calmet
attempts to generalize them under four distinct heads of signification,
but evidently fails. Brown also makes an abortive attempt of the same
sort.
Even when the Spirit of God is spoken of, it does not
always mean the same thing. The Spirit of God sometimes unequivocally
means the breath of natural life. Thus in Job xxvii. 3, "The Spirit of
God is in my nostrils, all the while the breath is in me." The four
winds are in the same metaphor, called the four spirits of the heavens.
(Zech. vi. 5.) The Spirit of God moving upon the face of the great
deep, may also be a figurative expression; for the Hebrews were
accustomed to express their superlative comparison by adding the word
God as an adjective to a noun. Thus "the cedars of God," "the hills of
God," "the mountains of God," were very lofty cedars, hills and
mountains. However this may be, we find the phrase does not always mean
the same thing.
The "Spirit of God" in the Old Testament is
spoken of thirteen times only. When Pharaoh discovered the divine
wisdom which was found in Joseph after he interpreted his visions, he
said to his servants, "Can we find such a man as this Joseph, in whom
the Spirit of God is?" The Lord also called Bezaleel of the tribe of
Judah and "filled [120] him with the Spirit of God, in wisdom,
understanding, and knowledge, and in all manner of workmanship." The
"Lord put wisdom in the hearts of all who were wise_hearted," who with
Aholiab and Bezaleel were to construct the tabernacle and its furniture
as the Lord commanded Moses. "The Spirit of God came upon Balaam [Num.
xxiv. 2], upon Saul [I. Sam. x. 10; xi. 6] and upon the messengers of
Saul [xix. 20], and they all prophesied." The Spirit of God in like
manner "came upon Azariah, and he preached to Asa, to Judah, and
Benjamin" (11. Chron. xv. 1). Ezekiel says (xi. 24), "The Spirit took
me up and brought me in vision by the Spirit of God into Chaldea." This
is all we learn of the Spirit of God from the Old Testament.
But
although we have not this phrase more frequently in the Old Testament,
much is said of the Spirit, in the ancient revelations. The Lord took
of the Spirit that was upon Moses, and put it upon the seventy senators
appointed to the government of Israel with Moses; and when the Spirit
came upon them they prophesied without intermission. (Num. xi. 17, 25.)
When Moses heard of their prophesying, he said, Would to God that all
the Lord's people were Prophets, and that the Lord would put his Spirit
upon them!
Caleb and Joshua are spoken of as men possessing
another spirit__it is spoken doubtless allusively to the Spirit of God.
The spirit of Elijah means the spirit which God bestowed upon him,
which also rested upon Elisha. The spirit came upon Amasa, one of
David's captains, as the spirit of courage; and the same spirit gave a
pattern of the Temple to David, according to which it was erected. (I.
Chron. xviii. 21.) This spirit dwelt in all the prophets. (Neh. ix.
39.) David prayed to be upheld by God's free Spirit. An excellent
spirit was found in Daniel, and God by Solomon, promised to pour out
his Spirit upon all who turned to the Lord. "Turn, you sinners, at my
reproof, and I will pour out my Spirit upon you." But
the phrase "Spirit of the Lord" frequently occurs in the Old Testament.
It is found twenty_six times, and is always used synonymously with the
Spirit of God. It, as well as the Spirit of God, sometimes signifies
the wind. Isa. xl. 7, "The grass withereth, the flower fadeth, because
the spirit of the Lord bloweth upon it. Surely the people is grass!" It
came on the great warriors and judges of Israel__on Othniel, on Gideon,
on Jephthah, on Samson, on Saul, on David, on Jehaziel, upon Isaiah,
upon Ezekiel, and upon Micah, and upon all the prophets. All who had
"the Spirit of the Lord," or "the Spirit of God," in this age of the
world, were supernaturally endowed in some respect or other.
"My
Spirit," in the mouth of the Lord, occurs ten times in the Old
Testament He promises to pour out his Spirit upon all flesh__upon all
who returned to him__upon all the seed of Israel__upon the Messiah
[121] __upon the prophets. This, of course, will be found in the same
acceptation of the phrase "Spirit of God," "Spirit of the Lord," unless
we regard it prospectively in reference to other influences promised in
the times of the Messiah. This, however, only applies to those promises
applicable to the Christian age.
"Holy Spirit," in the first
four thousand years of the world, is only found three times. David and
Isaiah are the old prophets who use it. David says (Ps. li.), "Take not
thy Holy Spirit from me;" and Isaiah (lxiii. 10, 11) says of Israel, in
reference to God's miraculous care of them, "They rebelled and vexed
his Holy Spirit; therefore, he turned to be their enemy, and he fought
against them. Then he remembered the days of old, Moses and his people,
saying, Where is he that brought them up out of the sea with the
Shepherd of his flock? Where is he that put his Holy Spirit within him,
that led them by the right hand of Moses with his glorious arm dividing
the water before them to make himself an everlasting name?" From this
we discover that the Holy Spirit is used as equivalent to the Spirit of
God bestowed on Moses and Joshua, to the Spirit of the Lord which fell
on the saviors of Israel.
It is here worthy of remark, that the
King's translators did never use the phrase Holy Ghost in translating
the Old Testament. On three occasions they ought, upon their own
principles, to have used it; for it is the same phrase, which in the
New Testament, with four exceptions, they have uniformly translated
"Holy Ghost."
Pneuma hagion, or to Pneuma to hagion, occurs
ninety_four times in the New Testament. Ninety times they translated it
Holy Ghost, and four times Holy Spirit. Curiosity is inquisitive to
find some reason for these four exceptions. They are found Luke xi. 13;
Eph. i. 13; iv. 30; I Thess. iv. 8. In Luke xi. 13 there is no
article__it simply reads, "Give a holy spirit to them that ask him."
They did not say, "Give a holy ghost." Why? Is it because there is no
article? We shall examine the other passages and see whether they are
uniform in this. Eph. i. 13; iv. 30, and I. Thess. iv. 8 the article is
found. Besides, in many other places, where the article is not found,
they have Holy Ghost. Is it because what Luke calls "Holy Ghost,"
Matthew, in quoting the same passage of Christ's discourse (chap. vii.
11), uses "good things?" Probably it was; for they seem to use "Holy
Ghost" as if by it a person was always intended; at least, this will
apply to the New Testament: for we have seen they have no Holy Ghost in
the Old Testament. But then it will be asked, Are they uniform in this?
Is not their Holy Ghost meant Eph. i. 13 and iv. 30 and I. Thess. iv.
8? It would appear so. But the construction is peculiar in Eph. i. 13,
for the arrangement is, "You are sealed by the spirit of the promise,
the holy:" and as the King's translators promised only the Holy [122]
Spirit in the Old Testament, and not the Holy Ghost, they could not
with propriety speak of a promised Holy Ghost: for in chap. iv. 30 they
seem to have their eyes turned back to Isa. lxiii. 11, where they
rendered it, "Grieve his Holy Spirit," and therefore they can not say,
"Grieve not the Holy Ghost of God," the figure in Isa. lxiii. 10, 11,
being the same found in Eph. iv. 30. They prefer to agree with
themselves in the Old Testament, rather than with themselves in the
New. And in the last place (I. Thess. iv. 8) we can find no reason,
except that they found it incongruous to use Holy Ghost in reference to
God himself__"Who has given to us his Holy Spirit," rather than his
Holy Ghost. This is, in all candor, all we can say in their defense.
There is, therefore, no good reason for preferring Ghost to Spirit
ninety times to four in the New Testament.
There is a saying
found in the covenant subscribed by Nehemiah, the governor, twenty_two
priests, seventeen Levites, and forty_four chiefs of Israel, which is
worthy of attention here. The Tirshatha (Neh. ix. 20), speaking of the
instructions given to Israel in the wilderness by Moses and Aaron,
says, "Thou gavest also thy good Spirit to instruct them, and
withheldest not the manna from their mouth, and gavest them water for
their thirst;" and in verse 30, speaking of the various prophets sent
to remonstrate with Israel, he says, "Thou testifiedst against them by
the Spirit in thy prophets; yet would they not give ear."
The
good Spirit, the holy Spirit, the Spirit of God, the Spirit of the
Lord, thy Spirit, and my Spirit, as applied to God in the Jewish
Scriptures, when not used metaphorically, always indicates the spirit
of supernatural wisdom, knowledge, power and goodness bestowed upon the
prophets, the kings, the priests, the judges, the artificers, the great
generals and illustrious men of Israel. It was the spirit of wisdom and
revelation in Moses and in the prophets: it was the spirit of might,
and power, and courage, in all the heroes and judges of Israel: the
Joshuas, the Gideons, the Samsons, the Davids, etc.; it was the spirit
of natural science and the fine arts in Bezaleel, Aholiab, and all the
ingenious artificers that erected and beautified the Tabernacle and
adorned the high priest of God. It was the spirit of holiness and
goodness in all the models of human excellence, which yet give a lustre
and renown to the splendid names enrolled on Israel's historic
page__which shed a celestial radiance around those magnificent
constellations which will shine in the Jewish firmament forever and
forever.
We now request the attention of our readers to one most
important and prominent acceptation of this term in the New
Institution. In order to this we shall carefully examine the phrase
"ministration of the Spirit." [123]
Although we have the word
diakonia, here rendered ministration, at least thirty_two tunes in the
Apostles' testimony, we have it but once in connection with the word
Spirit. (II. Cor. iii. 9.) This word is properly rendered by the word
ministration, ministry, serving, service, waiting, attendance, charge,
according to the connection. This is universally admitted. The most
common and current acceptation of the word is indicated by the term
ministry. Paul frequently uses it in this precise import.
In the
passage under consideration there can be no difficulty in ascertaining
the meaning; for the ministration of the Spirit is contrasted with the
ministration of death; and what is called the ministration of the
Spirit is also called the ministration of righteousness; and this again
is contrasted with the ministration of condemnation. Now the thing that
was formerly ministered is in verse 6 called letter; and the thing that
is now ministered is called spirit.
No passage in the Apostles'
writings abounds more with strong contrasts than this third chapter of
the second Epistle to the Corinthians. We have in it Old Institution
and New Institution__tables of stone, tables of the heart__letter and
spirit__killing and making alive__ministry of Spirit, ministry of
death, ministry of justification, ministry of condemnation, ministry of
Moses, ministry of the Apostles__Moses veiled, the Apostles
unveiled__fading glory, abounding glory__the thing abolished, and the
thing which continues.
The Apostle seems to have fallen into
this mood by the petulance of some who talked about his carrying
letters of recommendation to the church in Corinth. He told them that
they themselves were Christ's letters of recommendation to him, though
ministered by himself and his fellow_laborers, written not with ink,
but by the Spirit of the living God; not on tables of stone, but on the
fleshly tables of the heart.
Our present object, however, is
only to ascertain the precise import of the phrase ministry or
ministration of the Spirit. The contrasts drawn by the Apostle leaves
no doubt on the mind of the attentive student, that, by these words the
Apostle only means the introduction of the gospel, by the ministry of
the Apostles, contrasted with the introduction of the law by the
service or ministry of Moses.
The contrast throughout is between
two institutions__law and gospel__letter and spirit__a system of
condemnation, a system of justification__death and life__two
writings__one on stone, and one on the heart__one killing, the other
making alive__one veiled in figure, and one unveiled__the one tending
to bondage, the other to liberty.
The spirit, then, here is only
another name for the gospel. This is so evident that most critics and
commentators of eminence assert it. The reason is obvious__not indeed
because the gospel was first preached accompanied by "the gift of the
Holy Spirit"__not because the Apostles [124] proclaimed the gospel with
"the demonstration and manifestation of the Spirit;" for Moses in the
ministry of the letter was sustained by the Spirit of God, by various
demonstrations of its presence and power; but because the gospel is in
part "the promise of the Spirit," and is designed to minister the Holy
Spirit to all the believers. That which is begotten and born by the
gospel is a new and holy spirit; or, in other words, "that which is
born of the Spirit is spirit." Hence by a metonymy, a very common
figure of speech in the sacred writings, the gospel is sometimes called
the spirit.
Illustrative and confirmatory of this, the reader
has only to examine the context in which this phrase occurs. The Old
Institution or Testament is as often and as variously spoken of in this
chapter as the New Institution or the gospel. It is explained as "the
law written and engraven on two tables of stone." It is by the same
figure of speech called "condemnation"__"death"__because it ministered
condemnation and death. It is said "to kill," while the gospel quickens
or "makes alive."
Now, whatever gives life gives spirit. The law
gave no life, no spirit, except that of bondage, because it killed__the
gospel gives the spirit of liberty and life, because it makes alive.
The law was not, however, naked or abstract death; neither is the
gospel naked or abstract spirit. The law was death clothed in words of
threatening; the gospel is spirit clothed in words of life.
This
is not the only passage in which the Apostle thought and spoke in this
manner of contrast. We find him using the same leading contrasts and
giving the same designations to law and gospel. In Romans, seventh
chapter, he contrasts the state under Moses and under Christ__under the
letter and the spirit. In the beginning of the 8th chapter he asserts,
"There is no condemnation to them under Christ;" because under Christ
he has before shown, "we are not under law, but under favor." But here
he adds, "Because the law of the Spirit of life"__i. e., the gospel
coming by Jesus Christ, "has made me free from the law of sin and
death"__i. e., the letter. "We now serve in newness of spirit, and not
in oldness of the letter."
In the same context he speaks of
living according to the flesh, and according to the spirit; of living
in the flesh and in the spirit; of having both "Christ" and "the spirit
of Christ" dwelling in us; of being "led by the Spirit," and "having
the Spirit of God dwelling in us."
In his letter to the
Galatians he speaks in the same language: "Walk by the Spirit," says
he, "and you will not fulfill the lusts of the flesh." "If you be led
by the Spirit, you are not under the law." "Since we live by the
Spirit, let us also walk by the Spirit." And it is in this connection,
when contrasting law and gospel, the walking by the flesh and the
walking by the Spirit, he speaks of [125]
"THE FRUIT OF THE SPIRIT"
This
is opposed to the work of the flesh, the offspring of that principle,
which under the law works death. The phrase "fruit of the Spirit," in
the connection in which it stands, is equivalent to the fruit of the
gospel. The gospel obeyed works out "love, joy, peace, longsuffering,
gentleness, goodness, fidelity, meekness, temperance: against such
fruit there is no law" (Gal. v.). Again, says Paul (Eph. v. 8).
"Walk as children of light." (Now the fruit of this light [the Spirit]
consists in all goodness, and righteousness, and truth.) "Be filled
with the Spirit." "Let the word of Christ dwell richly in you,"
"singing psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs." Thus the phrases "Being
filled with the Spirit," and "Having the word of Christ [gospel]
dwelling richly in the heart," are explained by the same injunction to
sing psalms, hymns and spiritual songs, with grateful hearts to the
Lord. Compare Eph. v. 18, 19, and Col. iii. 16.
If, then (as I
presume the intelligent will perceive), the phrase "ministration of the
Spirit" mean the introduction of the gospel by the ministry of the
Apostles; and "the fruit of the Spirit" mean the practical results of
the gospel in the heart, or the gospel obeyed; and thus the term
"spirit," in the style of the Apostles, occasionally means no more than
the gospel, may it not be said that receiving the gospel into the
heart, is, in the Apostles' sense, receiving the Spirit?
This
question at least deserves a careful and devout examination. It is
obvious that Christ is received by receiving the gospel; and if Christ
be received by receiving the gospel, why not the Spirit of God also?
But
where is the proof that Christ is received by receiving the gospel? "He
came to his own people, and they received him not__believed not in him;
but to as many as received him to them he gave power to become the sons
of God," etc. To receive a person, is to receive him crediting and
cordially recognizing him in his own proper character. "As you have
received Christ Jesus the Lord," walk by his directions. Thus they who
credit his word, receive him; and are therefore said to "have Christ in
them." "If Christ be in you," says Paul to the Romans, "the body is
dead as respects sin." "That Christ may dwell in your hearts by faith."
"Christ liveth in me."
There was, then, a receiving of Christ,
familiarly spoken of in the age of the Apostles; and there was a
receiving of the grace of God, and a receiving of the Spirit also, in
receiving the gospel. There was a dwelling and living of Christ in the
heart; nay, there was an inhabitation of God himself in the hearts of
the believers. For "if a man love me," says the Messiah, "he will keep
my word, and my Father will love him, and we will come and make our
abode with him." [126] "Behold," says Jesus, "I stand at the door and
knock: if any man hear my voice and open the door, I will enter and sup
with him and he with me." "Our fellowship is with the Father and with
his Son Jesus Christ our Lord."
But besides this indirect and
figurative reception of the Spirit of God, the Holy Spirit, by the
gospel; these gracious influences, suggestions, illuminations,
consolations and invigorating impulses of the good Spirit of God, by
and through the gospel in the heart, making the heart a cistern, a
fountain whence living waters constantly flow; is there not a
substantive, a real and unfigurative reception of the Holy Spirit
himself, in the sense of the question Paul asked the Galatians (iii.
2), "Did you receive the Spirit by works of law, or by obedience of
faith?"
Such a reception of the Spirit there certainly was; and
of this "gift of the Holy Spirit," this "demonstration of the Spirit,"
this "manifestation of the Spirit," these "spiritual gifts," we have
already spoken as conferred upon the first fruits in the last days of
the Jewish age__in the setting up of the kingdom of the Messiah; but of
such a reception of the Spirit since the LAST DAYS of the Jewish age,
since the creation of one new man of believing Jews and Gentiles, and
the breathing into him the holy spirit of this new life, there has been
no substantive, abstract and literal communication of the Holy Spirit
to any man. Such is the experience of all the catholic congregation of
Christ. There has arisen no prophet, no originator of new ideas, no
worker of miracles, no controller of nature's laws, no person having
any manifestation of the Spirit, or showing any divine power among men. Now
these manifestations of the Spirit were for the benefit of the
community; but the Holy Spirit as now promised and received through the
gospel, is for the benefit of the subject himself. There are, however,
other phrases and terms found in the Christian Scriptures which require
our attention, and when correctly appreciated farther illustrate and
confirm the preceding.
Although with respect to various
misconceptions of what is written on this subject, we have enlarged our
remarks beyond the limits of literary investigation, still we aimed at
no more in this essay than a fair and full examination of the phrases
"ministration of the Spirit," one acceptation of the word "Spirit," the
"fruit of the Spirit," and "receiving of the Spirit." If we have
ascertained these, it is all the merit we claim for the present essay.
The
following Scriptural phrases are worthy of special consideration, in
attempting to understand what the Scriptures teach of the influence of
the Holy Spirit, in the hearts of believers:
"The Spirit bears
witness with our spirit."__"Grieve not the Spirit."__"Quench not the
Spirit."__"Led by the Spirit."__"Walk in the [127] Spirit."__"Live
after the Spirit."__"Strengthened with might by the Spirit in the
inward man."__"Sanctification of the Spirit."__Immersing into the name
of the Holy Spirit."__"Communion of the Holy Spirit."
That the
Spirit of God does influence believers, or work in their hearts, to
think, will, and do, according to the good pleasure of God, is a
proposition that no person, who has paid an ordinary attention to the
writings of the Apostles and Prophets, can reasonably deny.
But
concerning the nature, manner, and extent of this influence or
operation, real Christians have differed and may differ again, in their
apprehensions and communications. Our province is to understand and
teach the meaning of the words and sentences, which the inspired
writers have used on this subject, judging that when these are fairly
and fully, that is, grammatically and logically understood, we are in
possession of the ideas which God designed to communicate to us.
We
have clearly seen in the examinations already completed, that the
Spirit of God was the author of all the supernatural intelligence,
wisdom, and power, which appear in the writings and doings of all God's
messengers to men:__and that he is the author of all genuine goodness
in the human heart, is quite apparent. We have also discerned, that all
the converting power__or saving power, which the Spirit of God exerts
on the human mind, is now in and by the word written, read or heard;
for that where this word has never been heard or known, not one
supernatural idea exists;__not one ray of spiritual or celestial light
has shone.
"'Tis midnight with the soul, till he, Bright Morning Star, bid darkness flee."
But
whether this influence is direct or indirect; in the word only, or
without the word; abstract and naked, or clothed with light and motive;
have been, and still are, questions undecided by many. To assist such
persons, is our supreme object in instituting the present investigation
of words and phrases; and as we have already affirmed, we are now only
concerned to know and communicate the true intent and meaning of the
Scripture style, as though we were examining 'a matter, on which we had
formed no opinion ourselves.
Before we resume our philological
labors in the phrases now before us for examination, it may be
expedient to remark, with a special reference to the difficulties of
some of the more thoughtful on this subject, that, the whole work of
the Holy Spirit in the Apostles' time, was not to originate new ideas,
nor to clothe men with supernatural and extraordinary powers;__such as
speaking foreign languages, and tongues unknown before, and in
controlling or suspending the laws of physical nature; but in
strengthening the mind and memory, and in reviving the recollections of
things said and done, in [128] time long past,__and in reproducing the
exact images of things which had vanished from the mind. This is now
simply premised, in reference to some phrases shortly to be examined;
and to furnish to the curious speculators on this subject, some data,
which at least are entitled to their consideration. But
we proceed to the phrase, "The Spirit itself beareth witness with our
spirit, that we are the children of God" (Rom. viii. 16__Com. ver.).
"Also the Spirit itself beareth witness together with our spirit, that
we are the children of God."__Macknight. "Also this Spirit bears
witness together with our spirit, that we are children of God."__New
version, fourth edition.
The preceding verse, which reads, "You
have received the Spirit of adoption, by which we cry, Abba Father;"
seems to present the argument thus, "But this Spirit of adoption is not
the only proof that the believing Gentiles are the adopted sons of God:
for in addition to this, the spirit which has thus breathed into our
hearts the Spirit of adoption, has also borne, and still bears witness
to our son ship, by the spiritual gifts bestowed on the believing
Gentiles.
Two witnesses are adduced by the Apostles, concurring
in the establishment of the fact, that believing Gentiles are divinely
constituted sons of God. The first is the Spirit of adoption, which
they had individually received; infusing into their hearts the cry,
"Abba, Father;" the other, the extraordinary gifts, or the
manifestations of the Spirit, bestowed equally upon the Gentiles, at,
and after, their first calling into the kingdom of Jesus.
As Dr.
Macknight well observes, "God is said to have sealed the believing
Gentiles as his sons, by giving them the Spirit" (II. Cor. i. 22; v. 5;
Eph. i. 13, 14). "By the Spirit's witness, we are to understand a
particular revelation to individuals," the same translator distinctly
affirms.
I have learned from Prof. Stuart's version of the
Epistle to the Romans, and his notes on this passage, which appeared
since my dissertation in 1830, on the twenty_sixth and twenty_seventh
verses of this chapter, that I was not alone as I then apprehended, in
supposing the Spirit of adoption to be "the Spirit that intercedes for
us, in sighs which can not be uttered;" for he testifies, page 324,
that those who regard the Spirit of adoption spoken of in the fifteenth
verse, to be the same with the spirit spoken of in the sixteenth verse,
"compare this with verses twenty_six and twenty_seven, which they
construe in the same way."
"For a long time," says the
Professor, "I preferred this interpretation;" that is, making the
Spirit of God (verse 16) the same as the Spirit of adoption (verse 15).
"But," he adds, "repeated and attentive study of the whole passage in
the connection, has of late brought [129] me to a pretty full
persuasion, that auto to pneuma (verse 16) is the same as pneuma theou
(verse 14);" or that the Spirit of God, rather than the Spirit of
adoption, is intended in verse 16. I may add, that Professor Stuart in
his version, renders the verse in examination, thus__"The same Spirit
beareth witness to our spirit, that we are children of God." This may
be sustained by Rom. ii. 15; ix. 1; but is not in so full accord with
the word summarturei, according to the grammatical construction of the
Greek language, as in the new version. The Professor's version would,
however, better express my views of the passage than the new version,
if it could be as well sustained. For it is to our spirit the witness
is offered at last, read it as we may. I would paraphrase the passage
thus: "The Spirit of God by his demonstrations or seal vouchsafed to
the believing Gentiles, as well as to believing Jews, bears witness to
our understanding in conjunction with the Spirit of adoption, which we
have individually received, that we are children of God.
When we
speak of testimony or witness, there are two things always to be taken
into consideration;__the fact or proposition in support of which the
testimony is presented,__and the person or persons to whom the
testimony is offered. There is something to be proved; and some person
to whom or for whom it is to be proved. Now, a person can not be both
the subject and the object of the same testimony himself. For example.
Let the question be, "Am I a child of God?" This is to be ascertained
for my own satisfaction. I am the person to whom it is to be proved.
There is something represented by the pronoun I, which is constituted
judge in this case. This then can not be both witness and judge. A
witness in me must be something distinct from me. Well: what is the
witness in me distinct from myself, unless it be the Spirit of adoption
breathing in me all filial dispositions? Now if Paul and his companions
rejoiced in the testimony of their own conscience, why may I not
rejoice in the testimony of this witness? But as this is but one
witness, and as everything of importance requires two witnesses; and
especially as this witness may be suspected of being under the
influence of near relation and not easily cross examined, it requires a
concurrent testimony. Now this is that which the Spirit of God has
presented in the written word__sealed by its own demonstrations. An
exact correspondence between these two witnesses begets full
confidence, or satisfactorily answers the question, "Am I a child of
God?"
But it must be observed, that the testimony of God in the
authenticated word, and the testimony within, are both necessary to the
full assurance of our son ship. Hence, John says, "If our heart condemn
us not, then we have confidence." By loving "not in word only, but in
deed and in truth," says the divine Apostle, "we know that we are [130]
of the truth, and shall assure our hearts before him." Happy frames and
good feelings are no evidence of our son ship, unless sustained by the
testimony in the Holy Scriptures. And this calls for unreserved
obedience to all the commandments of Jesus.
But while this and
much more may be necessary to illustrate the testimony borne to our
spirits by the Spirit of God; the fact that such a witness exists, and
the bare meaning of the phrase, are all that fairly lie within our
present object. The Apostle's design in the connection in which the
phrase occurs, clearly ascertains its import. His proposition is: "As
many as are led by the Spirit, these are the sons of God." "To be led
by the Spirit," or to be led by any person, is simply to be guided by
what they say. Those thus led, are children of God. That they are the
children of God, is proved to themselves by two witnesses;__what the
Spirit has testified in the written word, and sustained by
miracles,__and by the filial dispositions, called the Spirit of
adoption, which it has inspired into the hearts of all the believers,
whether Jews or Gentiles.
In ascertaining the import of the
phrase, "The Spirit bears witness with our spirit," we quoted Dr.
Macknight as asserting that "by the Spirit's witness we are to
understand;" whereas it ought to have read, "By the Spirit's witness we
are not to understand a particular revelation to individuals." This
typographical mistake was not noticed till after we sat down to write
the present essay. It was implied, if not distinctly stated in our
last, that the phrase "spirit of adoption" indicates those filial
dispositions which are engendered in the believers by the Spirit of
God, and that to be "led by the Spirit," is, in our style, to be guided
by what he says to us.
The phrase now before us is, "Grieve not
the Spirit." In the common version of the Scriptures, God is said to
have been grieved for forty years with the manners of the Jews in the
wilderness. (Ps. xcv. 10; Heb. iii. 10, 17.) Again, the question is
asked (Ps. lxxviii. 40), "How often did they grieve him in the desert?"
Jesus also is said (Mark iii. 5) to have been "grieved at the hardness
of their hearts." From these Scriptures we may easily perceive the
meaning of grieving the Holy Spirit. As Israel of old grieved God in
the desert, so Christians may grieve the Holy Spirit by suffering
corrupt communications to escape their lips, or by disobeying his
precepts.
Children grieve their parents by their foolish
behavior, and Christians are figuratively said to grieve the Spirit
when they act in a way unbecoming his presence with them. The Lord was
present with the Jews in the wilderness, therefore they could grieve
him. His Spirit is in the congregation, and therefore Christians may
grieve him. The Spirit when grieved with Adam, forsook him__when
displeased with the Jews, it forsook them. David, when conscious of his
faults, prays, [131] "Take not thy Holy Spirit from me!" and the
command, "Grieve not the Spirit," implies that Christians may also be
forsaken by God.
"Quench not the Spirit." This phrase, like the
preceding, is found but once in the New Testament (I. Thess. v. 19).
The gift of the Holy Spirit having been like a flame of fire, this
figure is most expressive and beautiful. Referring to those gifts
extraordinary, enjoyed by many of the first converts, Jewish and
Gentile, the Apostle could, with all propriety of metaphor, say to them
who had any spiritual gift, "Quench not the Spirit," "Despise not
prophesying," etc. And to Timothy, in the same style, he could say,
"Stir up the gift which is in you." The word used in Timothy is
anazopurein, blow up this fire__quench it not__put not out this sacred
fire in yourself or in others, but rouse it to a flame.
To "walk
in the Spirit," and "live after the Spirit," are, in effect, the same
as to be "led by the Spirit." Christians who think, speak, and act
according to the gospel, are walking after, or according to, the
Spirit__living according to the Spirit__led by the Spirit. Thus the
Platonist was led by Plato__walked according to Plato__lived as Plato
directed.
"Strengthened with might by his Spirit in the inner
man" (Eph. iii. 16); or, "Mightily strengthened by his Spirit in the
inner man." Paul implores this blessing from God upon the Ephesians.
There is much to be learned from the prayers of the Apostles, both for
themselves and their brethren, as to their views, their practical views
of the influence and aid of the good Spirit of God. That they expected
some help from God of same sort, is clearly and fully expressed in all
their petitions, both for themselves and for one another. Let the
reader, intent on understanding the Apostles' views and style,
carefully examine their prayers, as if to learn what they expected to
be yet done for them. The following specimens will be sufficient to our
present purpose:
"On this account I bow my knees to the Father
of our Lord Jesus Christ, from whom the whole family in heaven and upon
earth is named, praying that, according to the riches of his glory, he
would grant you to be mightily strengthened by his Spirit in the inward
man; that Christ may dwell in your hearts through faith; that being
rooted and grounded in love, you may be completely able to apprehend,
with all the saints, what is the breadth, and length, and depth, and
height__even to know the love of Christ which surpasses knowledge, that
you might be filled with all the fullness of God. Now to him that is
able to do exceeding abundantly beyond all that we can ask or think,
according to the power which works effectually in us__to him be glory
in the congregation by Christ Jesus, during all the endless succession
of ages. Amen." [132]
That the Apostle expected the
strengthening of the faculties of the mind, by the Spirit of God in the
hearts of these saints at Ephesus, can not be doubted; but that this
was to be effected by faith__by Christ dwelling in the heart by faith,
is not to be questioned. If such petitions were necessary in the age of
spiritual gifts, they are no less so in the present time; and that the
Spirit of God does in some way by faith work in men both to will and to
do, and that he does and may do for us above all that we ask or think,
is not to be questioned, if Paul in this passage is to be understood
according to what we call common sense.
The thanksgivings, as
well as the petitions of the Apostle Paul, imply all this and more.
When he heard of the faith and love of the Ephesians, he said, "I cease
not to give thanks for you, making mention of you in my prayers__that
the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory, would give you
the spirit of wisdom and revelation in. the knowledge of him; that the
eyes of your understanding being enlightened, you may know what is the
hope of his calling, and what the riches of the glory of his
inheritance among the saints, and what the exceeding greatness of his
power in relation to us who believe, according to the working of his
mighty power which he wrought in Christ when he raised him from the
dead, and set him at his own right hand in heavenly places, far above
all government, and power, and might, and lordship, and every name that
is named, not only in this world, but also in that which is to come,"
etc.
The Apostles taught the Christians by precept or example to
pray for the following things:__for eloquence and boldness for those
who labor in the word and teaching; for wisdom for themselves; for
favor, mercy, and peace for the brotherhood; for the healing of the
sick; for an offending brother; for being filled with. the knowledge of
the will of God; for their own strength and that of their brethren; for
the good behavior of the brotherhood; for the protection and salvation
of kings, governors, and all sorts of men, for every promised blessing,
and for every necessary thing, either for the present or the future;
for themselves and for their brethren.1
These apostolic prayers
are full of edification: they are, in comparison of mere didactic
communications, as experiment to theory, or as example to precept. The
views of the Apostles on the subject of divine influences will be found
in their petitions, supplications, acid thanksgiving. That they
expected much in answer to their prayers, and that they and their
converts did not ask in vain, need not be argued to those who will
carefully examine this matter. [133]
But the phrase "communion
of the Holy Spirit," will still more fully illustrate their views. It
is koinonia, fellowship, joint participation. We have this word twenty
times from the day of Pentecost to the close of the Epistles. It is
twice applied to the Holy Spirit__II. Cor. xiii. 13; Phil. ii. 1. It is
applied to the Father and to the Son__I. John i. 3_6; I. Cor. 1. 9. We
have the communion of the Father, the communion of the Son, and the
communion of the Holy Spirit, or the fellowship of the Father, Son and
Holy Spirit; for it is the same term uniformly in the passages quoted.
The communion of saints; of the blood of Christ; of the body of Christ,
denote their joint participation of the influence, presence, and
comforts of the good Spirit of God.
We have communion with one
another when we mutually give and receive consolation, whether in
sentiment, in sympathy, in communication, or in any of the blessings of
society. Man was made for communion with God and his fellows, but he
lost it in Adam the first. In Adam the second he is restored to that
communion; but while in his mortal body his communion with God is only
by his Spirit through Jesus Christ our Lord.
But we have not yet
caught the precise idea expressed in the Apostle's benediction - "The
communion of the Holy Spirit be with you all"' There is suggested in
this phrase a participation of the Holy Spirit common to all the
members of the body of Christ. It is not some gift or special influence
of the Spirit, imparted only to a few; but that fellowship of the
Spirit which, under Christ, is common to the many--to all the family of
God - of which the Apostle spoke. The best definition of the word
communion which I can give, is, union in that which is common. Wherever
there is union in common, there is communion. As the glory of the Lord
equally filled all the tabernacle and the temple, so the Spirit of God
animates, consoles, and refreshes the whole body of Christ. These
consolations, joys, and refreshments from the presence of the Lord, the
Apostle imprecated upon all the Corinthian converts. He wished them a
full fellowship, an equal participation of those measures of the Holy
Spirit which belonged to the body of Christ as such. The three greatest
blessings which Paul could invoke on the Corinthians, were, "the favor
of our Lord Jesus Christ, the love of God, and the communion of the
Holy Spirit." These are not one and the same idea; but three distinct
ideas- -as distinct as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. He that enjoys the
favor of Jesus Christ, the love of God, and the communion of the Holy
Spirit, has all the fullness of God, and is as blessed as mortal man
can be.
Into these relations to the Father, to the Son, and to
the Holy Spirit we are immersed; for the Lord commanded the believers
to be immersed into the name of the Holy Spirit as well as into the
name [134] of the Father and the Son. To be immersed into the name of
the Holy Spirit, prepares for the enjoyment of this communion; as being
immersed into the Father, introduces into the enjoyment of the love of
God; and as immersion into the name of Jesus Christ, introduces us into
the favor of the Lord Jesus. This love, grace, and communion are the
superlative glory of the Christian institution. They are equally
apprehensible, though in their nature and modes of development
incomprehensible. It is the duty, honor, and privilege of Christians to
enjoy all that into which they are immersed. There is as much wisdom or
folly in disparaging the communion of the Holy Spirit, as in
undervaluing the love of God or the favor of Jesus Christ.
There
is also as much reason, and Scripture, and honor in being immersed into
the Holy Spirit, as into the name of the Lord Jesus. Should any one
think that the communion of the Holy Spirit has ceased, he may as well
imagine that the love of God has ceased and that the favor of Jesus
Christ is extinct. If he can not comprehend the one, he can not
comprehend the other. But as we are immersed into the name of the Holy
Spirit, we must look for and constantly expect the communion of that
Spirit, as well as the love of God and the favor of Jesus Christ our
Lord.
There yet remains the phrase "sanctification of the
Spirit." This understood, I presume the whole New Testament phraseology
on the subject of the Spirit will be easily understood by every
attentive reader. The original phrase is hagiasmos pneumatos, and is
found only in II. Thess. ii. 13; I. Pet. i. 2. In both places it
appears to refer to the sanctification of the spirit of believers. It
is literally rendered "sanctification [or holiness] of spirit." There
is no article in the original and no epithet that suggests the Holy
Spirit in either passage. God has chosen men to salvation through (or
by) holiness of spirit; not through the holiness of his Spirit, but
through the holiness of their spirit. When Jesus prayed (John xvii.)
for the sanctification or holiness of his disciples, it was through the
truth: "Sanctify them through the truth; thy word is truth." The belief
of the truth is, therefore, by Paul associated with this holiness or
sanctification of spirit. The Spirit of God is frequently denominated
in these days, "the Sanctifier." Let it be granted that it is the
Spirit that sanctifies or sets apart men to God, still it must be
argued from the Record that he sanctifies them only through the truth
or gospel believed. A sanctified unbeliever is inconceivable; and, as
"without holiness [or sanctification of spirit] no man can see the
Lord;" so, without faith, there can be no holiness, and no action
acceptable to God.
All persons sanctified to God to any high
office or function, were anointed, and thus consecrated to his special
service. So all Christians, being priests, are anointed or sanctified
by the Holy Spirit [135] through the obedience of the truth, and
sprinkling of the blood of Jesus, cleansing their consciences from dead
works to serve the living God. In this we find the secret of the most
usual epithet of the Spirit. It is the Spirit of holiness, because it
is the Spirit of truth. It is the Holy Spirit, because by its influence
it makes us holy; and these influences which sanctify are always by and
through the truth. When God chose men to salvation, it was through
sanctification of spirit; and as a means to this, it was through the
belief of the truth.
The KJV states, "There is none (no one)
that holdeth with me in these things, but Michael your prince." Now,
just let that last thought sink in a little bit. What is Gabriel
telling Daniel? There is no one else who can stand by my side or is
able to "hold with me in these things" but Michael your prince. What is
Gabrielle saying? It is very obvious to me that she is telling Daniel
that Michael is equal to her and she is equal to Michael. I see no
mystery here in these very plain words. So, Michael and Gabrielle
fought and stood side by side all through the Great Controversy in the
Old Testament. And it was Gabrielle who announced the coming of the
Messiah to both Zechariah in the temple and Mary in her home as well as
the Shepherds the night of Jesus' birth. But when Jesus became a human
being they were split apart just like Adam and Eve were separated from
Michael and Gabrielle in the Garden of Eden. So, the Wedding Supper of
the Lamb is for the purpose of joining together that which has been
split apart by sin. But in order to do that sin must be eradicated from
the Bride so that she becomes pure and spotless and her robes are
without stain, spot or wrinkle.
Jesus, who is Michael and
Gabrielle, His sister spouse and the wave sheaf or the Barley, which is
the beginning of the harvest (first phase of a perfected humanity) and
the promise that all will follow in order as the Father has planned.
You see Michael and Gabriel and Adam and Eve were split up when Satan
deceived Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eve. So they were split up when
Jesus came into our dimension and took on a body of flesh. Now, this
should really break our hearts. He gave up this incredible love
relationship with His beloved, His sister_spouse. We cannot know how
much pain that caused them for how much closer could you be to another
being than to be: 1. Sister_brother and 2. twins on top of that and. 3.
Then to be married as sister_spouse or husband and wife. We do not
understand this at all in our culture. But the deities (gods and
goddesses in the pagan religions copied or counterfeited this with
Tammuz and Ishtar in ancient Assyria and Babylon. Then you have Osiris
and Isis in Egypt who were twins... sister_spouse. The same is found in
Greece and Rome with Apollo and Diana or Venus his twin
sister_spouse.
Beloved, we need to do a lot more investigation
into how and why those counterfeits existed because where there is a
counterfeit there has to be a genuine or original because there can
never be a shadow of something without the existence of the reality.
That is how we prove the Mother image of God...because of the Queen of
Heaven...Jeremiah 44....they worshiped the Queen of heaven and ate
cakes to her like they do to Mary, the physical mother of Jesus. We
also have Tammuz and Semiramis, the ancient pagan goddess of the Moon
who was married to Nimrod, the Mighty hunter before or against the
Lord. Nimrod was the first anti-Christ who built the Tower of Babel.
Semiramis was a very beautiful woman...a priestess in the temple who
married Nimrod. He died and she taught that he went to heaven and
became the God of the Sun or Sun God and from then on they worshiped
the Sun as they believed they were thereby worshiping Nimrod. Semiramis
was an immoral woman like Jezebel who no doubt had many lovers and
relationships. She got pregnant and had Tammuz. And then they picture
Semiramis and Tammuz as having a sexual relationship in the pagan
religions. This was done on purpose to blaspheme and counterfeit the
relationship between Jesus and His mother and to distort the real
meaning of the true family of God and the relationship we are to have
with them. All this needs to be explained to the people so they will
understand who God is what this Wedding Supper of the Lamb is all
about.. Ezekiel 1 and Rev. 4 and 5 reveal that the God head is not a
trinity of three males but is composed of four individuals. We know for
sure that the Father created all the worlds through His only Son, Jesus
and that are created in the exact image of the Creator, the Father.
.Heb. 1:1_3. John 1:1_3. If One man and One woman were created by God
the Father through Jesus then there had to be a female Goddess involved
as well in order for Eve to be created...In their exact image.
I
believe that Gabrielle was with Jesus throughout His earthly life. The
Bible reveals special times when she came to him like in the desert
when He fasted and then in the Garden of Gethsemane when He sweat
blood. She came to comfort Him. The SOP tells us in "Desire of Ages,"
that she encouraged and strengthened Him to go through with the
sacrifice. Just think of the suffering they were going through, each of
them, as well as the Father and Mother. I believe only the Father knows
all things from the beginning to the end and the Son has had to learn
as He has gone along just like we do along with His Sister Spouse.
"Though He were a Son, yet learned He obedience by the things which He
suffered; And being made perfect, He became the author of eternal
salvation unto all them that obey Him." Heb. 5:8, 9.
We know
that Jesus continually stated that the Father is greater than Him, John
14:28 and that only the Father knows the day and hour of His return.
"It is not for you to know the times or the season, which the Father
has put in His own power." Acts 1:7. My final thought here on this
topic is simply this. Just as Jesus learned obedience through what He
suffered so can we. We have a destiny which Jesus came to reveal to us.
Will we accept Him at His Word that He is able to transform us into His
image and likeness that we may be translated when He comes for His wave
sheaf? That is the opportunity that is being held out to all in Jesus'
invitation to the Wedding Supper of the Lamb. The Father waits for our
willingness to be filled with His Spirit which is the Spirit of God
which includes all four members of the God head. What a great privilege
is ours today to enter into this marvelous experience with our precious
Lord Jesus Christ who has suffered so much for us. May the Lord bless
and keep each of you as you pray and think on these great themes of
salvation. Your friend always in Him, Pastor Mike Clute.
El Shaddai _ the Breasted One, or Who's that Lady?
Psalm 87; Galatians 4:26; Revelation 12 DEFINITIONS
The Hebrew word shaddai comes from the root word 'breast'. Literally translated it would mean 'many_breasted one'. click here
There
are two roots for the word: first is to be powerful and second is
breast or nourisher and sustainer. The O.T. uses this form 48 times. click here
The word "Almighty" is translated from the Hebrew Shaddai, which, according to Hebraists, is a plural word.
Thomas
points out in Phanerosis that the Shaddai plunged Sodom and Gomorrah to
destruction, whilst protecting and caring for Abraham ( Genesis 17:1 ).
The word is derived from a Hebrew root which, according to the vowel
points, can signify either nourisher (breast _ Heb. shad) or destroyer
(shadad).
The Almighty nourished Abraham, but destroyed the
wicked people of Sodom. Yahweh can be to us either a Nourisher or a
Destroyer, according as we treat Him and His Word (see Psalm 18:24_27
); a "savour of life unto life or death unto death" ( 2 Corinthians
2:16 ). click here
The
term is usually explained as a cognate of the Akkadian word sadu,
"mountain," but not in the sense that 'El Shaddai would mean "G_d the
Rock" (cf. zur, "Rock," an epithet of G_d, e.g., Deuteronomy 32:4,30,37
). Rather, 'El Shaddai would mean "'El_of_the_Mountain," i.e., of the
cosmic mountain, the abode of 'El; for the Patriarchs the term would
mean "the G_d of Heaven." (The Jewish Encyclopaedia) click here
The
Hebrew and Christian scriptures have been dismissed lately as
patriarchal texts with little or no God imagery for women to identify
with. The criticism is accepted, yet there remain traces of maternal
imagery that have not been overridden by the patriarchs and their
mythographers. This includes breast and nursing imagery, of which even
the title of God used in Exodus 6:2_3 , El Shaddai, traditionally
interpreted as the Almighty, may be interpreted as the Breasted One
from the Hebrew word shad, meaning breast, instead of using the
Akkadian word shadu meaning mountain.
Mountains have peaks and
Mt. Sinai and Mt Zion are two mountains from which law and light like
milk and honey have flowed for the betterment of mankind. When Israel
entered Canaan, they were divided into two camps on Mt. Gerizim and Mt.
Ebal. These two mountains symbolized the blessing and curse attributes
of the Covenant God made with Israel. Hence the "nourisher" and
"destroyer" aspects of the name, El Shaddai.
We know who this
person is. The "breasted one" with "peaks" is a real person, not a
mountain as some assert, although mountains are part of the allegory.
"El" is a reference for God. "Shad" means the breast. All mothers use
them to suckle their young. When God said, "Let us make man in our
image and likeness," He was communing with His Wife! El Shaddai refers
to Her oneness with Her Husband and Her position as co_head of the
Family. Mother is revealed in Proverbs 8 and the first part of Proverbs
9 . Mother Wisdom is the Mother of the living. Wisdom is an initiate in
the creations, Wisdom of Solomon 7:21_29 . Enoch wrote about Her in
Secrets of Enoch XXV. There She is parabolized as "Adoil" having a
belly full of "children of light". All infants are housed in the
mother's womb where development takes place. In Psalm 87 where God says
of Mother Zion, "This man and that man (any man and all men) was born
in Her", He is referring to what happened to Her as "Adoil". He
concludes in that Psalm saying, "All my (off) springs are in thee"
meaning all my sons and daughters were created in your belly. One of
Her works is to exalt Her sons, Sirach 1:1_15, 4:11_18 . All of this
happened before God rested from His labors in the beginning. Once upon
a time, all of us were little spirit nursery_mates waiting for our time
and generation to be salted in the clay! Mother has more children now
than the 12 pairs of angelic beings She saw in the beginning. God had a
joyous surprise for Mother, too. Joy is His way of concluding things.
Look at this: Isaiah 49:18_22, 54:1_8, 60:1_14.
KJV Isa 54:1
Sing, O barren, thou [that] didst not bear; break forth into singing,
and cry aloud, thou [that] didst not travail with child: for more [are]
the children of the desolate than the children of the married wife,
saith the Lord. 2 Enlarge the place of thy tent, and let them stretch
forth the curtains of thine habitations: spare not, lengthen thy cords,
and strengthen thy stakes; 3 For thou shalt break forth on the right
hand and on the left; and thy seed shall inherit the Gentiles, and make
the desolate cities to be inhabited. 4 Fear not; for thou shalt not be
ashamed: neither be thou confounded; for thou shalt not be put to
shame: for thou shalt forget the shame of thy youth, and shalt not
remember the reproach of thy widowhood any more. 5 "For thy Maker [is]
thine husband; the Lord of hosts [is] his name; and thy Redeemer the
Holy One of Israel; The God of the whole earth shall he be called. 6
For the Lord hath called thee as a woman forsaken and grieved in
spirit, and a wife of youth, when thou wast refused, saith thy God. 7
For a small moment have I forsaken thee; but with great mercies will I
gather thee. 8 In a little wrath I hid my face from thee for a moment;
but with everlasting kindness will I have mercy on thee, saith the Lord
thy Redeemer."
KJV Isa 60:1 Arise, shine; for thy light is come,
and the glory of the Lord is risen upon thee. 2 For, behold, the
darkness shall cover the earth, and gross darkness the people: but the
Lord shall arise upon thee, and his glory shall be seen upon thee. 3
And the Gentiles shall come to thy light, and kings to the brightness
of thy rising. 4 Lift up thine eyes round about, and see: all they
gather themselves together, they come to thee: thy sons shall come from
far, and thy daughters shall be nursed at [thy] side. 5 Then thou shalt
see, and flow together, and thine heart shall fear, and be enlarged;
because the abundance of the sea shall be converted unto thee, the
forces of the Gentiles shall come unto thee. 6 The multitude of camels
shall cover thee, the dromedaries of Midian and Ephah; all they from
Sheba shall come: they shall bring gold and incense; and they shall
shew forth the praises of the Lord. 7 All the flocks of Kedar shall be
gathered together unto thee, the rams of Nebaioth shall minister unto
thee: they shall come up with acceptance on mine altar, and I will
glorify the house of my glory. 8 Who [are] these [that] fly as a cloud,
and as the doves to their windows? 9 Surely the isles shall wait for
me, and the ships of Tarshish first, to bring thy sons from far, their
silver and their gold with them, unto the name of the Lord thy God, and
to the Holy One of Israel, because he hath glorified thee. 10 And the
sons of strangers shall build up thy walls, and their kings shall
minister unto thee: for in my wrath I smote thee, but in my favour have
I had mercy on thee. 11 Therefore thy gates shall be open continually;
they shall not be shut day nor night; that [men] may bring unto thee
the forces of the Gentiles, and [that] their kings [may be] brought. 12
For the nation and kingdom that will not serve thee shall perish; yea,
[those] nations shall be utterly wasted. 13 The glory of Lebanon shall
come unto thee, the fir tree, the pine tree, and the box together, to
beautify the place of my sanctuary; and I will make the place of my
feet glorious. 14 The sons also of them that afflicted thee shall come
bending unto thee; and all they that despised thee shall bow themselves
down at the soles of thy feet; and they shall call thee, The city of
the Lord, The Zion of the Holy One of Israel.
KJV Isa 49:18 Lift
up thine eyes round about, and behold: all these gather themselves
together, [and] come to thee. [As] I live, saith the Lord, thou shalt
surely clothe thee with them all, as with an ornament, and bind them
[on thee], as a bride [doeth]. 19 For thy waste and thy desolate
places, and the land of thy destruction, shall even now be too narrow
by reason of the inhabitants, and they that swallowed thee up shall be
far away. 20 The children which thou shalt have, after thou hast lost
the other, shall say again in thine ears, The place [is] too strait for
me: give place to me that I may dwell. 21 Then shalt thou say in thine
heart, Who hath begotten me these, seeing I have lost my children, and
am desolate, a captive, and removing to and fro? and who hath brought
up these? Behold, I was left alone; these, where [had] they [been]? 22
Thus saith the Lord God, Behold, I will lift up mine hand to the
Gentiles, and set up my standard to the people: and they shall bring
thy sons in [their] arms, and thy daughters shall be carried upon
[their] shoulders.
KJV Isa 25:6 And in this mountain shall the
Lord of hosts make unto all people a feast of fat things, a feast of
wines on the lees, of fat things full of marrow, of wines on the lees
well refined. 7 And he will destroy in this mountain the face of the
covering cast over all people, and the vail that is spread over all
nations. 8 He will swallow up death in victory; and the Lord God will
wipe away tears from off all faces; and the rebuke of his people shall
he take away from off all the earth: for the Lord hath spoken [it]
Commenting
about this in Psalm 82:6_8 , the Creator states, "I said, Ye are gods
and all of you are children of the Most High". Because we know the way
we go and our destination as exemplified in Jesus' crucifixion, when He
adds, "but ye shall die as men", we no longer view death as an
intimidating threat. Death is the designated door leading to eternity.
It has no sting and the grave is a sign of a man's personal VICTORY!
Hosea 13:14 So … "What is man that thou art mindful of him"? We are
placed on the lesser Earth and "crowned with glory and honor", Hebrews
2:6_8. We are the little "images" of the Most High God, His beloved
sons and daughters, the apples of His eyes and clay_bound angels! Our
Father is El Jah and our Mother is El Shaddai!
Why is this El
Shaddai document significant? Not only because it establishes important
facts about Wisdom's name and God's wife. Consider the abominations
going on out there in the world _ the homosexuality, the lesbianism,
the transvestite behavior _ people do not believe that "what God has
created is forever", Ecclesiastes 3:14 . Male and female roles are
fixed eternally. The world of spiritual "Babylon and Sodom and
Gomorrah" does not believe this and mixes genders indiscriminately.
Christians add to the problem by claiming that ultimately "we will
become like angels", ie. NEUTERED. This is due to their ignorance about
angels. They hide behind Paul's own personal ignorance and "knowing in
part" where he says in error, "There is neither male nor female",
Galatians 3:28. That which is perfect is here NOW, and you must let go
of Paul's two_day_old darkness, I Corinthians 13:8_12. Beware of
2000_year_old (manna) doctrine! But if you are a chicken, you will love
the worms! Remember, Colonel Sanders (founder of Kentucky Fried Chicken
Restaurants ) is upstairs now, and he is on our TEAM! If you hold on to
that darkness you may end up "finger_licking good"!
Wisdom/Shaddai
is the first Being of God's creations Proverbs 8:12_34 and is the form
and pattern for all of Her daughters. God will not undo Her, neither
will He undo any one of Her daughters! Therefore it is important to
establish Her identity for all time (and each woman's), as God must do
as stated in Psalm 87 . (This is the daughter who says in Proverbs 8
that she was with the Creator when He laid the foundations of the earth
(Jesus Christ or Michael, whose name means God like or One who is in
the image or likeness of God, Heb. 1:1_3).
Since God will not
undo what He has created (male and female), just what is He going to
reject, destroy, and throw out (since El Shaddai is both nourisher and
destroyer in one of the definitions above)? Here is the answer! Check
out our Omega site (The Robot), where we discuss what will be destroyed
and thrown away. If you're wondering what God has planned with respect
to our male and female roles ( Gospel of Philip verse 65 ) take a look
at our Heaven site (The Wedding Feast) .
In one of the
definitions above, Thomas points out that the Shaddai allowed or
permitted Sodom and Gomorrah to be destroyed while protecting and
caring for Abraham. We did not elaborate on why El Shaddai withdrew her
protection from Sodom and Gomorrah! Sodom is an ancient rendering of
the name _ Satan. Lucifer had caused that ancient city to be named in
his glory and honor. The story of Hagar and Ishmael was designed by El
Jah to tell us what happened in Heaven long ago. Shaddai caused or
permitted Lucifer and Babylon to be kicked out and plunged to hell
below, saying, "That bondwoman (Babylon) and her son (Lucifer) shall
not be heirs with me and my children". Therefore to affront Shaddai and
create a stink in Her face, they decided to turn the nature of Her
children living in that city backwards. They attempted to reverse the
sexual order and orientation Shaddai designed for us while in Her womb.
Mother will tolerate only so much evil. She does not want Her sons and
daughters made over by demons as a slap in Her face while She is
watching it! Yet we are allowed by El Jah to experience even this
degree of backwardness so we can understand perfectly that only "good"
order is expected from and respected by His children as we go through
this learning phase. We are made in the image and likeness of El Jah
and El Shaddai, not the likeness of Babylon and Satomail (Sodom or
Lucifer); check out Babylon, the Other Woman.
When Gabriel
visited Mary to tell her of Jesus' birth, he said, "The power of the
Almighty will overshadow you". Mary birthing Jesus is the image of
Adoil (El Shaddai) conceiving us ( see "You Must be Born of a Virgin
Like Jesus"). Over_SHAD_owing ... God/El "over" Shaddai to birth us.
Male and Female forever. But bastard robotic natures that pervert the
male/female relationship can be easily destroyed because they are
non_living forms. A mother protects her own children and worries about
her daughters and sons _ Shaddai is not an unmindful ( Job 39:13_15 )
mother to lose any one of her children. "Robot" spirit Sodomites cannot
and will not remold us to be what God did not intend us to be! Demons
are miserable "potters". have a rendezvous with the Great Claymaster
and Potter/Pater _ Isaiah 55:8_11; Jeremiah 18:1_6; Ezekiel 20:32_38.
Welcome to the ultimate, glorious Wedding Feast for all. God makes His
dreams come true and fulfills all of ours (see the true Dream Team
site).
If humanity was created in the "image & likeness" of
God then when Daniel saw Michael & Gabrielle they would appear to
be like us, only in an unfallen state. And "God said, Let us make man
in our image, after our likeness...in the image of God created he him;
male and female created he them." Gen 1:26, 27. Let us now ask this
question which we cannot escape if we are going to be intellectually
honest in our pursuit of the truth. If Adam was created in the image of
Jesus Christ or Michael, a male, then in whose image was Eve created?
The obvious answer is in the image of a female because Eve was a woman.
This fits perfectly with the Hebrew word "Elohim," which has three
elements. 1. Plural. 2. Male. 3. Female. This never changes. So, what
we have here is a very serious Gender issue which Paul addressed in Rom
1:19_32. And is this not the same question we are facing today in this
last age with the "Same Sex Marriage" issue? This is in our face every
day of the week in the media. It is very obvious that there are seen
and unseen forces at work to destroy the very image and likeness of God
in the human race. In Rom 1:20 Paul tells us that from "Creation of the
world" the "invisible things of Him (God) are "clearly seen, being
understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and
Godhead; so that they are without excuse."
As Paul continues on
in Rom 1 we see him going to the heart of the question re: the Godhead
itself, i.e. the male/female issue. Paul is not only referring to the
sexual corruption and perversion in the Roman society of his own day
but has in mind what happened before the flood when men took plural
wives and women were degraded to the status of a slave. And then after
the flood we see further degradation in the cities of Sodom &
Gomorrah in a homosexual society. "Professing themselves to be wise,
they became fools, and changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into
an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and four-footed
beasts, and creeping things. Wherefore God also gave them up to
uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts...who changed the
truth of God into a lie, and worshiped and served the creature more
than the Creator...For this cause God gave them up unto vile
affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that
which is against nature: And likewise also the men, burned in their
lust one toward another; men with men...etc." Rom 1:19_28.
And
so we see that the study of Daniel & Revelation is also a study of
God's original creation via Michael & Gabrielle, our real Father
& Mother, the true parents of this ravaged planet. "And I heard a
man's voice (Michael or Jesus) between the banks of Ulai, which called,
and said, Gabriel, make this man (Daniel) to understand the vision."
Dan 8:16. Why would Daniel need to make a distinction between a male
and a female voice by stating that he heard a "man's voice? Why?
Because Gabrielle, with her feminine voice was the one who was talking
to him most of the time. May the Lord bless each of you as we enter
upon a new year, 2007.
Here is a very important quote which
gives important and vital insight into how the "Holy Spirit" was
changed from a feminine gender to the masculine gender. Muy Importante!
I will try to find the source.
“The gospels of the bible were
called the Greek gospels not just because they were written in Greek
but also because they entertained Greek philosophy. Either both are
from heaven or both are pagan. If the former, then revelation and
paganism mean the same. If the latter, then Christianity is pagan.
Applying the title "Word" or "Logos" to Jesus is a pagan amalgamation
with Essenism, and was not fully accepted until the middle of the
second century. The Trinity is a pagan doctrine.
Divine
Trinities were male Gods. No female was admitted into the triad of Gods
composing the orthodox Trinity. Plainly there can never be males
without females, so the whole idea is an obvious Patriarchal variant of
an earlier belief in which one of the spirits in the Trinity must have
been female. The truth is that he Trinity grew from a belief in the
feminine principle as the mother and therefore creator of everything.
The Patriarchs imposed a male Supreme god relegating the female
principle to the role of his assistant as, his spirit, Word or Wisdom.
That was not sufficient however and the divine son was introduced.
Finally the female principle, now reduced to the Holy Ghost, the Word
having been allocated to the Son, had a sex change and became masculine
or neuter.
The Trinity was constituted of males simply because
under the patriarchs women became mere tools of man''s convenience.
Instead of having a place among the gods she became a servant, but the
time is coming when she will rule both heaven and earth with the
omnipotent power of her love nature. Then we shall have no war in
heaven and no conflict with the earth.
The Trinity
The
Trinity of Christendom, as defined in the creed of Nicea, is a merging
of three distinct entities into one single entity, while remaining
three distinct entities. Christians must regard the three gods as one
god because they are co_eternal, co_substantial and co_equal, though
only the first had a life of his own! The others emanated from the
first.
This Neo_Platonic doctrine is, of course, pagan not
Jewish and, since the Jewish scriptures form part of the Christian
bible, it is heretical (Isaiah 43:10) to imagine the Trinity as three
separate gods. This mumbo_jumbo arises clearly and precisely because
the first bishops opportunistically tried to merge Judaism with
paganism. Most ancient religions were built upon some sort of threefold
distinction. Deities were always trinities of some kind or consisted of
successive emanation in threes.
The oldest and probably the
original form of the Trinity is that found in Indian religion.
Classical Hinduism dates back to at least 500BC, with roots extending
as far back as 2000BC. The Hindus had a doctrine of the divine trinity
called Tri_murti (Three_forms) consisting of Brahma, Vishnu, and Siva:
Brahma, the Father or supreme God, Vishnu, the incarnate Word and
Creator, and Siva, the Spirit of God, the Holy Spirit or Ghost. It is
an inseparable unity though three in form. Worshipers are told to
worship them as one deity.
|